| Fiche détaillée |
|
|
| Simulation and Knowledge of action, John Benjamins (Ed.) (2002) 201-228 |
|
|
|
|
| Liste des fichiers attachés à ce document : | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Can "radical" simulation theories explain psychological concept acquisition ? |
|
|
| Joëlle Proust1 |
|
|
| (2002) |
|
|
| This paper examines the response offered by Robert Gordon to the question how an interpreter can reach the correct content of others'psychological states (beliefs & desires). It exposes the main problems raised by Gordon's proposal, and provides a tentative solution that emphasizes the structuring role of counterfactual reasoning in embedding simulations and deriving facts that are holding across them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 : | IJN - Institut Jean-Nicod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thématiques scientifiques | : | Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Philosophie/Philosophie de l'esprit |
|
|
| simulation – agency – mental concept – theory of mind – context |
| ijn_00000632, version 1 | |
| http://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000632 | |
| oai:jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr:ijn_00000632 | |
| Contributeur : Joëlle Proust | |
| Soumis le : Mercredi 19 Octobre 2005, 12:10:26 | |
| Dernière modification le : Mercredi 19 Octobre 2005, 12:10:26 | |