Do mass nouns constitute a semantically uniform class?

Abstract : Research on mass nouns has focused on concrete terms. So, are there semantic properties shared by all mass terms? We first consider concrete nouns like 'milk' and 'furniture'. Contra Cheng (1973), we show that they can be held to refer distributively (i.e. to apply to any part of what they apply to) only if this property is understood with a new part-relation, that of N-part. In addition, they refer cumulatively: when they apply to each of two things, they also apply to the two things considered together. We then turn to abstract mass terms like 'beauty' and 'love'. We find, surprisingly, that they too refer distributively and cumulatively.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 2002
Liste complète des métadonnées
Contributeur : David Nicolas <>
Soumis le : mardi 25 juin 2002 - 09:54:14
Dernière modification le : jeudi 6 décembre 2018 - 01:53:09
Document(s) archivé(s) le : samedi 3 avril 2010 - 20:06:43


  • HAL Id : ijn_00000056, version 1



David Nicolas. Do mass nouns constitute a semantically uniform class?. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 2002. 〈ijn_00000056〉



Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers