Do mass nouns constitute a semantically uniform class?

Abstract : Research on mass nouns has focused on concrete terms. So, are there semantic properties shared by all mass terms? We first consider concrete nouns like 'milk' and 'furniture'. Contra Cheng (1973), we show that they can be held to refer distributively (i.e. to apply to any part of what they apply to) only if this property is understood with a new part-relation, that of N-part. In addition, they refer cumulatively: when they apply to each of two things, they also apply to the two things considered together. We then turn to abstract mass terms like 'beauty' and 'love'. We find, surprisingly, that they too refer distributively and cumulatively.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 2002
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000056
Contributeur : David Nicolas <>
Soumis le : mardi 25 juin 2002 - 09:54:14
Dernière modification le : mardi 24 avril 2018 - 17:20:08
Document(s) archivé(s) le : samedi 3 avril 2010 - 20:06:43

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ijn_00000056, version 1

Collections

Citation

David Nicolas. Do mass nouns constitute a semantically uniform class?. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 2002. 〈ijn_00000056〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

316

Téléchargements de fichiers

881