Does Linguistic Communication Rest on Inference?

Abstract : It is often claimed that, because of semantic underdetermination, one can determine the content of an utterance only by appealing to pragmatic considerations concerning what the speaker means, what his intentions are. This supports ‘inferentialism' : the view that, in contrast to perceptual content, communicational content is accessed indirectly, via an inference. As against this view, I argue that primary pragmatic processes (the pragmatic processes that are involved in the determination of truth-conditional content) need not involve an inference from premisses concerning what the speaker can possibly intend by his utterance. Indeed, they need not involve any inference at all : communication, I argue, is as direct as perception.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Mind and Language, Wiley, 2002, 17 (1-2), pp.105-126
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000090
Contributeur : François Recanati <>
Soumis le : jeudi 27 juin 2002 - 19:22:08
Dernière modification le : mardi 24 avril 2018 - 17:20:08
Document(s) archivé(s) le : samedi 3 avril 2010 - 20:08:02

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ijn_00000090, version 1

Collections

Citation

François Recanati. Does Linguistic Communication Rest on Inference?. Mind and Language, Wiley, 2002, 17 (1-2), pp.105-126. 〈ijn_00000090〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

265

Téléchargements de fichiers

777