Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

The alleged priority of literal interpretation

Abstract : In this paper I argue against a widely accepted model of utterance interpretation, namely the LS model, according to which the literal interpretation of an utterance (the proposition literally expressed by that utterance) must be computed before non-literal interpretations can be entertained. Alleged arguments in favor of this model are shown to be fallacious, counterexamples are provided, and alternative models are sketched.
Complete list of metadatas

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000181
Contributor : François Recanati <>
Submitted on : Monday, October 14, 2002 - 3:18:49 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, September 22, 2020 - 3:50:29 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, April 3, 2010 - 8:15:55 PM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : ijn_00000181, version 1

Collections

Citation

François Recanati. The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science, Wiley, 1995, 19, pp.207-232. ⟨ijn_00000181⟩

Share