-. Scope, noted the following types of examples, in which scope connectivity fails to hold: (90) a. Some student admires every teacher Reading 1: [?x: x a student] [?y: y a teacher] (x admires y) Reading 2: [?y: y a teacher] [?x: x a student] (x admires y) b. What some student admires is every teacher Reading 1: [?x: x a student, Reading 2: [?y: y a teacher] [?x: x a student, 1995.

S. &. Beck and . Hotze-rullmann, A Flexible Approach to Exhaustivity in Questions, Natural Language Semantics, vol.7, issue.3, pp.249-298, 1999.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008373224343

C. Cecchetto, Connectivity and Anti-Connectivity in Pseudoclefts Syntactic or Semantic Reconstruction? Evidence from Pseudoclefts and Clitic Left DislocationQuestions with Quantifiers, Proceedings of NELS 30. Amherst, Massachusetts: GLSA Cecchetto, Carlo Semantic Interfaces, CSLI publications Chierchia, pp.181-234, 1993.

G. Chierchia, Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena, and the Syntax, 2000.

D. Dikken, A. Marcel, C. Meinunger, and . Wilder, Pseudoclefts and ellipsis, Studia Linguistica, vol.54, issue.1, pp.41-89, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9582.00050

J. Eisner, Quantifier Connectedness in Pseudoclefts, 1995.

J. Groenendijk and . Stokhof, Partitioning Logical Space. Annotated handout. Second European Summerschool in Logic, Language and Information, 1990.

J. Groenendijk and . Stokhof, Questions, Handbook of Logic and Language, pp.1055-1124, 1997.

J. Guéron, Types syntaxiques et types s??mantiques??: la phrase copulative comme palimpseste, Revue qu??b??coise de linguistique, vol.22, issue.1, pp.77-115, 1992.
DOI : 10.7202/602754ar

C. L. Hamblin, QUESTIONS IN MONTAGUE ENGLISH, Foundations of Language, vol.10, pp.41-53, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-0-12-545850-4.50014-5

I. Heim, Concealed Questions, Semantics from Different Points of View, pp.51-60, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-67458-7_5

I. Heim, Interrogative Complements of 'Know The Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics (IATL1), Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference and the Workshop on Discourse, pp.128-144, 1994.

I. &. Heim and A. Kratzer, Semantics in Generative GrammarPseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.30, issue.3, pp.365-397, 1998.

F. R. Higgins, The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English, 1976.

P. Hirschbühler and . Rivero, NON-MATCHING CONCEALED QUESTIONS IN CATALAN AND SPANISH AND THE PROJECTION PRINCIPLE, The Linguistic Review, vol.2, issue.4, pp.331-363, 1983.
DOI : 10.1515/tlir.1983.2.4.331

S. &. Iatridou and S. Varlokosta, Pseudoclefts Crosslinguistically, Natural Language Semantics, vol.6, issue.1, pp.3-28, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008272704531

R. Izvorski, On the Type of 'Be' and on the Nature of the Wh-Clause in Specificational Sentences, Hand-out, 1997.

P. Jacobson, Binding Connectivity in Copular Sentences, Proceedings of SALT IV, pp.161-178, 1994.
DOI : 10.3765/salt.v4i0.2456

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

D. Kaplan, Quantifying in, Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, 1969.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00568057

L. Karttunen, Syntax and semantics of questions, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.4, issue.1, pp.3-44, 1977.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00351935

A. Meinunger, A monoclausal structure for (pseudo-)cleft sentences The Raising of Predicates, NELS hand- out Moro Andrea, 1997.

B. Partee, Ambiguous Pseudoclefts with Unambiguous Be, 1986.

W. V. Quine, Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.53, issue.5, pp.177-187, 1956.
DOI : 10.2307/2022451

J. Ross and . Robert, Act' Semantics of Natural Language, :D. Reidel and Company, pp.70-126, 1972.

J. R. Ross, The Source of Pseudocleft Sentences', hand-out, 1985.

J. R. Ross, That Is the Question', paper presented at the University of Pennsylvania RossThe frozenness of pseudoclefts ? towards an inequality-based syntax, Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.385-426, 1997.

J. Ross and . Robert, Inversion and Coreference in Pseudoclefts', ms., U. of North Texas SchlenkerPseudocleft Connectivity and the Structure of Noun Phrases', ms, Connectivity in Specificational Sentences, pp.299-304, 1998.