Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Adaptationism for Human Cognition: Strong, Spurious or Weak?

Abstract : Strong adaptationists explore complex organic design as task-specific adaptations to ancestral environments. Its strategy seems best when there is evidence of homology. Weak adaptationists don't assume that complex organic (including cognitive and linguistic) functioning necessarily or primarily represents task-specific adaptation. Its approach to cognition resembles physicists' attempts to deductively explain the most facts with fewest hypotheses. For certain domain-specific competencies (folkbiology) strong adaptationism is useful but not necessary to research. With group-level belief systems (religion) strong adaptationism degenerates into spurious notions of social function and cultural selection. In other cases (language, especially universal grammar) weak adaptationism's “minimalist” approach seems productive.
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Scott Atran <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, December 17, 2003 - 11:18:27 PM
Last modification on : Friday, July 2, 2021 - 9:58:02 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, April 3, 2010 - 8:30:21 PM


  • HAL Id : ijn_00000436, version 1



Scott Atran. Adaptationism for Human Cognition: Strong, Spurious or Weak?. Mind and Language, Wiley, 2004. ⟨ijn_00000436⟩



Record views


Files downloads