You don't Know How you Think: Introspection and Language of Thought

Edouard Machery
Abstract : The question, ‘Is cognition linguistic?' divides recent cognitive theories into two antagonistic groups. Sententialists claim that we think in some language, while advocates of non linguistic views of cognition deny this claim. The Introspective Argument for Sententialism is one of the most appealing arguments for sententialism. In substance, it claims that the introspective fact of inner speech provides strong evidence that our thoughts are linguistic. This article challenges this argument. I claim that the Introspective Argument for Sententialism confuses the content of our thoughts with their vehicles: while sententialism is a thesis about the vehicles of our thoughts, inner speech sentences are the content of auditory or articulatory images. The rebuttal of the introspective argument for sententialism is shown to have a general significance in cognitive science: Introspection does not tell us how we think.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2004
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000446
Contributeur : Nicolas Bullot <>
Soumis le : jeudi 1 avril 2004 - 14:43:34
Dernière modification le : lundi 15 juin 2015 - 15:07:43
Document(s) archivé(s) le : samedi 3 avril 2010 - 20:31:11

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ijn_00000446, version 1

Collections

Citation

Edouard Machery. You don't Know How you Think: Introspection and Language of Thought. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2004. 〈ijn_00000446〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

272

Téléchargements de fichiers

363