Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

You don't Know How you Think: Introspection and Language of Thought

Edouard Machery
Abstract : The question, ‘Is cognition linguistic?' divides recent cognitive theories into two antagonistic groups. Sententialists claim that we think in some language, while advocates of non linguistic views of cognition deny this claim. The Introspective Argument for Sententialism is one of the most appealing arguments for sententialism. In substance, it claims that the introspective fact of inner speech provides strong evidence that our thoughts are linguistic. This article challenges this argument. I claim that the Introspective Argument for Sententialism confuses the content of our thoughts with their vehicles: while sententialism is a thesis about the vehicles of our thoughts, inner speech sentences are the content of auditory or articulatory images. The rebuttal of the introspective argument for sententialism is shown to have a general significance in cognitive science: Introspection does not tell us how we think.
Complete list of metadatas

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000446
Contributor : Nicolas Bullot <>
Submitted on : Thursday, April 1, 2004 - 2:43:34 PM
Last modification on : Monday, June 15, 2015 - 3:07:43 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, April 3, 2010 - 8:31:11 PM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : ijn_00000446, version 1

Collections

Citation

Edouard Machery. You don't Know How you Think: Introspection and Language of Thought. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2004. ⟨ijn_00000446⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

478

Files downloads

765