Can "radical" simulation theories explain psychological concept acquisition ?

Abstract : This paper examines the response offered by Robert Gordon to the question how an interpreter can reach the correct content of others'psychological states (beliefs & desires). It exposes the main problems raised by Gordon's proposal, and provides a tentative solution that emphasizes the structuring role of counterfactual reasoning in embedding simulations and deriving facts that are holding across them.
Type de document :
Chapitre d'ouvrage
Jérôme Dokic, Joëlle Proust. Simulation and Knowledge of action, John Benjamins, pp.201-228, 2002, 8


https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00000632
Contributeur : Joëlle Proust <>
Soumis le : mercredi 19 octobre 2005 - 12:10:26
Dernière modification le : jeudi 29 septembre 2016 - 01:09:58
Document(s) archivé(s) le : samedi 3 avril 2010 - 20:45:55

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ijn_00000632, version 1

Collections

Citation

Joëlle Proust. Can "radical" simulation theories explain psychological concept acquisition ?. Jérôme Dokic, Joëlle Proust. Simulation and Knowledge of action, John Benjamins, pp.201-228, 2002, 8. <ijn_00000632>

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de
la notice

317

Téléchargements du document

158