M. Bar-hillel, The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments, Acta Psychologica, vol.44, issue.3, pp.211-233, 1980.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3

M. Bar-hillel, The Base Rate Fallacy Controversy, Decision making under uncertainty, pp.39-61, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62193-7

D. E. Dulany and D. J. Hilton, Conversational Implicature, Conscious Representation, and the Conjunction Fallacy, Social Cognition, vol.9, issue.1, pp.85-110, 1991.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.85

J. Evans, . B. St, and P. Pollard, Statistical judgement: A further test of the representativeness construct, Acta Psychologica, vol.51, issue.2, pp.91-103, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(82)90054-3

G. Gigerenzer, How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond ???Heuristics and Biases???, European Review of Social Psychology, vol.172, issue.1, pp.83-115, 1991.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.483

G. Gigerenzer, On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky., Psychological Review, vol.103, issue.3, pp.592-596, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592

G. Gigerenzer, W. Hell, and H. Blank, Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.14, issue.3, pp.513-525, 1988.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.513

Z. Ginossar and Y. Trope, The effects of base rates and individuating information on judgments about another person, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.16, issue.3, pp.228-242, 1980.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(80)90066-9

Z. Ginossar and Y. Trope, Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.52, issue.3, pp.474-484, 1987.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.464

V. Girotto, M. Kemmelmeier, D. Sperber, and J. Van-der-henst, Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task, Cognition, vol.81, issue.2, pp.69-76, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00124-X

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000100

P. Grice, Studies in the way of words, 1989.

D. Hilton, The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment., Psychological Bulletin, vol.118, issue.2, pp.248-271, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.248

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, On the psychology of prediction., Psychological Review, vol.80, issue.4, pp.237-251, 1973.
DOI : 10.1037/h0034747

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, On the reality of cognitive illusions., Psychological Review, vol.103, issue.3, pp.582-591, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582

J. J. Koehler, The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.13, issue.01, pp.1-53, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.75

J. A. Krosnick, F. Li, and D. R. Lehman, Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and individuating information on social judgments., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.59, issue.6, pp.1140-1152, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1140

L. Macchi, Pragmatic Aspects of the Base-rate Fallacy, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.1, issue.1, pp.188-207, 1995.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.67

L. Macchi, Partitive Formulation of Information in Probabilistic Problems: Beyond Heuristics and Frequency Format Explanations, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.82, issue.2, pp.217-236, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.2000.2895

G. Mosconi, Discorso e Pensiero, Discourse and thought]. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1990.

G. Mosconi and L. Macchi, The role of pragmatic rules in the conjunction fallacy, Mind & Society, vol.37, issue.2
DOI : 10.1007/BF02512074

A. Norenzayan and N. Schwarz, Telling what they want to know: participants tailor causal attributions to researchers' interests, European Journal of Social Psychology, vol.43, issue.8, pp.1911-1020, 1999.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<1011::AID-EJSP974>3.0.CO;2-A

C. L. Olson, Some apparent violations of the representativeness heuristic in human judgment., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.2, issue.4, pp.599-608, 1976.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.599

M. T. Orne, Demand characteristics and the concept of quasicontrols, Artifact in behavioral research, pp.143-179, 1969.

G. Politzer, Laws of language use and formal logic, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.33, issue.30, pp.47-92, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01067391

G. Politzer, La psychologie du raisonnement: lois de la pragmatique et logique formelle. [The psychology of reasoning: Laws of pragmatics and formal logic], 1993.

G. Politzer, Reasoning, judgment, and pragmatics
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000615

G. Politzer, Premise interpretation in conditional reasoning Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment, and decision making

G. Politzer and L. Macchi, Reasoning and pragmatics, Mind & Society, vol.51, issue.1, pp.73-93, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02512230

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000615

G. Politzer and I. A. Noveck, Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations?, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.37, issue.2, pp.83-103, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01067877

M. L. Schubauer-leoni and A. Perret-clermont, Social interactions and mathematics learning, Learning and teaching mathematics. An international perspective, pp.265-283, 1997.

N. Schwarz, Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation, 1996.

N. Schwarz, F. Strack, D. Hilton, and G. Naderer, Base Rates, Representativeness, and the Logic of Conversation: The Contextual Relevance of ???Irrelevant??? Information, Social Cognition, vol.9, issue.1, pp.67-84, 1991.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.67

D. Sperber, F. Cara, and V. Girotto, Relevance theory explains the selection task, Cognition, vol.57, issue.1, pp.31-95, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-M

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Relevance: Communication and cognition, 1995.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment., Psychological Review, vol.90, issue.4, pp.293-315, 1983.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293

J. Van-der-henst, D. Sperber, and G. Politzer, When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of indeterminate relational problems, Thinking & Reasoning, vol.82, issue.1, pp.1-20, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/0278-7393.6.6.741

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000099

J. Van-der-henst, S. Rossi, and W. Schroyens, When participants are not misled, they are not so bad after all: A pragmatic analysis of a rule discovery task, Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2002.