J. Adler, An optimist's pessimism conversation and conjunction Probability and rationality: Studies on L. Jonathan Cohen's philosophy of science, pp.251-282, 1991.

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes., Psychological Bulletin, vol.82, issue.2, pp.261-277, 1975.
DOI : 10.1037/h0076477

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Use and misuse of Bayes' theorum in causal attribution: Don't attribute it to Ajzen and Fishbein either., Psychological Bulletin, vol.85, issue.2, pp.244-246, 1978.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.85.2.244

M. Allais, Fréquence, probabilité et hasard. [Frequency, probability and chance], J Soc fr stat, pp.70-102, 1983.

M. Anderson and S. Sunder, Professional Traders as Intuitive Bayesians, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.64, issue.2, pp.185-202, 1995.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.1995.1099

N. Anderson, Contributions to information integration theory. Vols 1 and 2, 1991.

J. Baratgin, Is the human mind definitely not Bayesian? A review of the various arguments, Cah Psychol Cogn, vol.21, pp.653-680, 2002.

J. Baratgin, Base rate neglect: A focus on the methodology of the Engineer-Lawyer paradigm Advances in psychology research, pp.183-198, 2002.

J. Baratgin and I. Noveck, Not only base rates are neglected in the Engineer-Lawyer problem: An investigation of reasoners??? underutilization of complementarity, Memory & Cognition, vol.47, issue.1, pp.79-81, 2000.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03211578

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00653810

M. Bar-hillel, The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments, Acta Psychologica, vol.44, issue.3, pp.211-233, 1980.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3

T. Bayes, An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. By the Late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. Communicated by Mr. Price, in a Letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol.53, issue.0, pp.370-418, 1763.
DOI : 10.1098/rstl.1763.0053

A. Beck, Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders, 1976.

R. Beyth-marom and H. Arkes, Ars Conjectandi Thurniciorum fractum Being accurate but not necessarily Bayesian: Comment on Christensen-Szalanski and Beach, Bernoulli J Organ Behav Hum Perf, vol.31, pp.355-357, 1713.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90124-1

M. Birbaum, Base Rates in Bayesian Inference: Signal Detection Analysis of the Cab Problem, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.96, issue.1, pp.85-94, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/1422211

E. Borel, Valeur pratique et philosophie des probabilités. [Practical and philosophical value of probability] In Traité du calcul des probabilités et de ses applications [Treatise of probability calculus and its applications], Treatise of probability calculus and its applications. Gauthiers-Villars, 1939.

D. Budescu, S. Weinberg, and T. Wallsten, Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.14, issue.2, pp.281-294, 1988.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.281

C. Callen, Notes on a grand illusion: Some limits on the use of Bayesian theory in evidence law, Indiana Law J, vol.57, pp.1-44, 1982.

W. Casscells, A. Schoenberger, and T. Grayboys, Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory Results, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.299, issue.18, pp.999-1000, 1978.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM197811022991808

V. Chase, R. Hertwig, and G. Gigerenzer, Visions of rationality, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.2, issue.6, pp.206-214, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01179-6

G. Chesley, Elicitation of subjective probabilities: A review, Accounting Rev, vol.50, pp.325-337, 1975.

J. Christensen-szalanski, The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature., American Psychologist, vol.39, issue.1, pp.75-78, 1984.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.39.1.75

J. Cohen, Chance, skill, and luck. The psychology of guessing and gambling, 1960.

J. Cohen and C. Hansel, La répartition des probabilités subjectives. [The distribution of subjective probability], J Psychol Norm Pathol (Paris), vol.4, pp.431-438, 1957.

L. Cohen, On the psychology of prediction: Whose is the fallacy?, Cognition, vol.7, issue.4, pp.385-402, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(79)90023-4

L. Cohen, Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.70, issue.03, pp.317-331, 1981.
DOI : 10.1037/h0035224

L. Cohen, Are People Programmed to Commit Fallacies? Further Thoughts about the Interpretation of Experimental Data on Probability Judgment, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol.21, issue.4, pp.251-274, 1982.
DOI : 10.1093/mind/LXVII.267.344

P. Cohen, Heuristic reasoning about uncertainty: An artificial intelligence approach, 1985.

L. Cosmides and J. Tooby, Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty, Cognition, vol.58, issue.1, pp.1-73, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8

R. Cox, Probability, Frequency and Reasonable Expectation, American Journal of Physics, vol.14, issue.1, pp.1-13, 1946.
DOI : 10.1119/1.1990764

S. Curley and J. Golden, Using Belief Functions to Represent Degrees of Belief, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.58, issue.2, pp.271-303, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.1994.1037

D. Silva-neves, R. Raufaste, and E. , Polymorphism of human judgment under uncertainty Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty, pp.647-658, 2001.

D. Davidson and S. Hirtle, Effects of Nondiscrepant and Discrepant Information on the Use of Base Rates, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.103, issue.3, pp.343-357, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/1423214

D. Davis and C. Holt, Experimental Economics, 1993.

D. Zeeuw, G. Wagenaar, and W. , Are subjective probabilities probabilities? In von Holstein CS (ed) The concept of probability in psychological experiments, pp.73-101, 1974.

B. De-finetti, Fondamenti logici del ragionamento probabilistico. [The logical foundations of probabilistic reasoning], B Unione Mat Ital, vol.9, pp.258-261, 1930.

B. De-finetti, Rôle et domaine d'application du théorème de Bayes selon les différents points de vue sur les probabilités. [Role and domains of application of Bayes' theorem according to the various viewpoints on probability]. Colloque de calcul des probabilités, pp.67-82, 1951.

B. De-finetti, Les problèmes psychologiques sur les probabilités subjectives. [The psychological problems on subjective probabilities], J Psychol Norm Pathol, vol.2, pp.253-259, 1955.

B. De-finetti, L'informazione, il ragionamento, l'inconscio nei rapporti con la previsione. [Information, reasoning and the unconscious in connection with forecast], pp.3-27, 1957.

B. De-finetti, Dans quel sens la théorie de la décision est-elle et doit être « normative ». [In what sense decision theory is, and should be, La Décision [Decision]. Editions du CNRS, pp.159-169, 1961.

B. De-finetti, Does it make sense to speak of " good probability appraisers " ? In Good IG (ed) The scientist speculates, pp.357-364, 1962.

B. De-finetti, La décision et les probabilities. [Decision and probability], Rev. math. pures. appl, vol.3, pp.405-413, 1963.

B. De-finetti, Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources Studies in subjective probability, pp.53-118, 1937.

B. De-finetti, La probabilità: guida nel pensare e nell'agire. [Probability: A guide to think and act, 1965.

B. De-finetti, Logical foundations and measurement of subjective probability, Acta Psychologica, vol.34, pp.129-145, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90012-0

B. De-finetti, Probability, statistics and induction: Their relationship according to the various points of view In de Finetti B, Probability, induction and statistics. The art of guessing, pp.141-228, 1959.

B. De-finetti, The value of studying subjective evaluation of probability The concept of probability in psychological experiments, pp.3-14, 1974.

B. De-finetti, The true subjective probability problem The concept of probability in psychological experiments, pp.15-23, 1974.

B. De-finetti, Probability: Beware of falsifications, Scientia, vol.111, pp.56-79, 1976.

B. De-finetti, Theory of probability, 1970.
DOI : 10.1002/9781119286387

B. De-finetti, On the subjective meaning of probability, Probabilità e induzione. Clueb, pp.291-321, 1931.

B. De-finetti and L. Savage, Sul modo di scegliere le probabilità iniziali. [On the ways of selecting prior probabilities], Fondamenti della statistica [Foundations of statistics]. Biblioteca del Metron, Serie C: Note e Commenti, pp.81-154, 1962.

L. Dodson, Simulation system design for a TEAS simulation research facility. Planning Research Corporation, 1112.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, Possibility theory. An approach to computerized processing of uncertainty, 1985.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01136336

D. Dubois and H. Prade, Modelling uncertainty and inductive inference: A survey of recent non-additive probability systems, Acta Psychologica, vol.68, issue.1-3, pp.53-78, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90045-5

D. Dubois and H. Prade, A survey of belief revision and updating rules in various uncertainty models, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol.52, issue.1, pp.61-100, 1994.
DOI : 10.1002/int.4550090105

R. Duh and S. Sunder, Incentives, learning and processing of information in a market environment: An examination of the base-rate fallacy, pp.50-79, 1986.

D. Dulany and D. Hilton, Conversational Implicature, Conscious Representation, and the Conjunction Fallacy, Social Cognition, vol.9, issue.1, pp.85-100, 1991.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.85

J. Earman, Bayes or Bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory, 1995.

W. Edwards, The theory of decision making., Psychological Bulletin, vol.51, issue.4, pp.380-417, 1954.
DOI : 10.1037/h0053870

W. Edwards, Conservatism in human processinged) Formal representation of human judgment, pp.17-52, 1968.

W. Edwards, Human cognitive capabilities, representativeness, and ground rules for research Analyzing and aiding decision processes, pp.507-513, 1983.

W. Edwards, H. Lindman, and L. Savage, Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research., Psychological Review, vol.70, issue.3, pp.193-242, 1963.
DOI : 10.1037/h0044139

W. Edwards and L. Phillips, Man as transducer for probabilities in Bayesian command and control system Human judgments and optimality, pp.17-52, 1964.

H. Einhorn and R. Hogarth, Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and Choice, Annual Review of Psychology, vol.32, issue.1, pp.53-88, 1981.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413

I. Erev and B. Cohen, Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.45, issue.1, pp.1-18, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90002-Q

E. Jstbt, P. Brooks, and P. Pollard, Prior beliefs and statistical inference, Brit J Psychol, vol.76, pp.469-477, 1985.

B. Fischhoff and R. Beyth-marom, Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective., Psychological Review, vol.90, issue.3, pp.239-260, 1983.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.239

B. Fischhoff and S. Lichtenstein, Don't attribute this to Reverend Bayes., Psychological Bulletin, vol.85, issue.2, pp.239-243, 1978.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.85.2.239

J. Fisk and N. Pidgeon, Conditional probabilities, potential surprise, and the conjunction fallacy, Q J Exp Psychol, vol.51, pp.655-681, 1998.

M. Fréchet, Rapport général sur les travaux du colloque de calcul des probabilités. [General report on the work of the Conference on the probability calculus, Colloque de calcul des probabilités. [Conference on probabilities calculus]. Editions du CNRS, pp.1-21, 1951.

M. Fréchet, Un problème psychologique sur les probabilités subjectives irrationnelles. [A psychological problem on irrational subjective probabilities], J Psychol Norm Pathol, vol.1, pp.431-438, 1954.

M. Fréchet, Remarques sur l'article de M. de Finetti. [Remarks on Mr. de Finetti's article], J Psychol Norm Pathol, vol.2, pp.260-261, 1955.

A. Freeling and N. Sahlin, Combining evidence Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory, C.W.K. Gleerups, pp.58-74, 1983.

J. Funaro, An empirical analysis of five descriptive models for cascaded inference, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.14, issue.2, pp.186-206, 1975.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90023-9

P. Gärdenfors, Probabilistic reasoning and evidentiary value Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory, C.W.K. Gleerups, pp.44-57, 1983.

P. Gärdenfors, Knowledge in flux, modeling the dynamics of epistemic states, 1988.

P. Gärdenfors, Belief revision Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory, 1983.

C. Gettys, C. Kelly, and C. Peterson, The best guess hypothesis in multistage inference, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.10, issue.3, pp.364-373, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90024-X

C. Gettys, C. Michel, J. Steiger, C. Kelly, and C. Peterson, Multiple-stage probabilistic information processing, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.10, issue.3, pp.374-387, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90025-1

C. Gettys, A model for which Dodson's algorithm is appropriate, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.10, issue.3, pp.424-426, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90028-7

C. Gettys and T. Wilke, The application of Bayes's theorem when the true data state is uncertain, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.4, issue.2, pp.125-141, 1969.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(69)90003-8

G. Gigerenzer, On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky., Psychological Review, vol.103, issue.3, pp.592-596, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592

G. Gigerenzer, W. Hell, and H. Blank, Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.14, issue.3, pp.513-525, 1988.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.513

G. Gigerenzer and U. Hoffrage, How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats., Psychological Review, vol.102, issue.4, pp.684-704, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

G. Gigerenzer and D. Murray, Cognition as intuitive statistics, 1987.

G. Gigerenzer and P. Todd, The ABC Research Group (eds) (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart

D. Gillies, Was Bayes a Bayesian?, Historia Mathematica, vol.14, issue.4, pp.325-346, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0315-0860(87)90065-6

V. Girotto, Il ragionamento Il Mulino, Bologna González-Vallejo CC, Erev I, Wallsten TS (1994) Do decision quality and preference order depend on whether probabilities are verbal or numerical?, Am J Psychol, vol.107, pp.157-172, 1994.

I. Good, Probability and the weighing of evidence. C. Griffin, London Good IJ (1971) 46656 varieties of Bayesians, Amer Statistician, vol.25, pp.62-63, 1950.

I. Good, Explicativity, corroboration, and the relative odds of hypotheses, Synthese, vol.42, issue.6, pp.39-73, 1975.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00485294

I. Good, The Bayesian influence, or how to sweep subjectivism under the carpet Foundations of probability theory, statistical inference, and statistical theories of science, Proceedings of a Conference in May, pp.125-174, 1973.

P. Grice, Studies in the way of words, 1989.

D. Griffin and A. Tversky, The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence, Cognitive Psychology, vol.24, issue.3, pp.411-435, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-R

I. Hacking, The emergence of probability: A philosophy study of early ideas about probability, induction, and statistical inference, 1975.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511817557

M. Hammerton, A case of radical probability estimation., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.101, issue.2, pp.252-254, 1973.
DOI : 10.1037/h0035224

K. Hammond, Probabilistic functioning and the clinical method., Psychological Review, vol.62, issue.4, pp.255-262, 1955.
DOI : 10.1037/h0046845

D. Hilton, The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment., Psychological Bulletin, vol.118, issue.2, pp.248-271, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.248

U. Hoffrage, G. Gigerenzer, S. Krauss, and L. Martignon, Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not, Cognition, vol.84, issue.3, pp.343-352, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00050-1

URL : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ShoppingCartURL&_method=add&_eid=1-s2.0-S0010027702000501&originContentFamily=serial&_origin=article&_ts=1480637342&md5=4a335b26a5424cce7775a239231d1b7f

C. Hooker and W. Harper, Foundations of probability theory, statistical inference, and statistical theories of science, Proceedings of a Conference in May, 1973.

E. Jaynes, Probability theory: The logic of science, 1994.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511790423

R. Jeffrey, The logic of decision Theory of probability The two camps on rationality, Scholz RW (ed) Decision making under uncertainty, pp.627-641, 1931.

D. Kahneman and D. Miller, Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives., Psychological Review, vol.93, issue.2, pp.136-153, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, On prediction and judgment, ORI (Oregon Research Institute), vol.12, issue.5, 1972.

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness, Cognitive Psychology, vol.3, issue.3, pp.430-450, 1972.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, On the psychology of prediction., Psychological Review, vol.80, issue.4, pp.237-251, 1973.
DOI : 10.1037/h0034747

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Can irrationality be intelligently discussed?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.4, issue.03, pp.509-510, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90019-1

D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, 1982.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511809477

H. Katsuno and A. Mendelzon, On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising ited) Belief revision, pp.183-203, 1992.

D. Kaye, Introduction. What is Bayesianism? Probability and inference in the law of evidence: The uses and limits of Bayesianism, Kluwer Academic, pp.1-20, 1988.

J. Koehler, The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.13, issue.01, pp.1-53, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.75

S. Kripke, Semantical analysis of modal logic, Z Math Logik, vol.9, pp.62-67, 1962.

J. Krosnick, F. Li, and D. Lehman, Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and individuating information on social judgments., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.59, issue.6, pp.1140-1152, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1140

H. Kyburg, Intuition, competence, and performance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.65, issue.03, pp.341-342, 1961.
DOI : 10.1126/science.7455683

H. Kyburg, Rational belief, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.6, issue.02, pp.231-273, 1983.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413

H. Kyburg, Higher order probabilities and intervals, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.2, issue.3, pp.195-209, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0888-613X(88)90116-8

P. Laplace, Memoir on " probability of causes " . (transl, SM Stigler) Stat Sci, vol.1, pp.359-378, 1986.

M. Leon and N. Anderson, A ratio rule from integration theory applied to inference judgments., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.102, issue.1, pp.27-36, 1974.
DOI : 10.1037/h0035677

I. Levi, Should Bayesians sometimes neglect base rates?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.68, issue.03, pp.341-342, 1981.
DOI : 10.1037/h0029790

I. Levi, Who commits the base rate fallacy?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.4, issue.03, pp.502-506, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3

I. Levi, ILLUSIONS ABOUT UNCERTAINTY, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol.36, issue.3, pp.331-340, 1985.
DOI : 10.1093/bjps/36.3.331

C. Lewis and K. G. , On the difficulties underlying Bayesian reasoning: A comment on Gigerenzer and Hoffrage., Psychological Review, vol.106, issue.2, pp.411-416, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.411

D. Lewis, Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities, Psychol Rev, vol.3, pp.297-315, 1976.

J. Logue, Projective probability. Oxford Philosophical Monographs, 1995.

L. Lopes, Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian inference, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, vol.8, issue.6, pp.509-512, 1985.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03329868

L. Lopes, The Rhetoric of Irrationality, Theory & Psychology, vol.1, issue.1, pp.65-82, 1991.
DOI : 10.1177/0959354391011005

L. Macchi, On the communication and comprehension of probabilistic information: Commentary on Koehler on base-rate, Psycoloquy, vol.5, issue.11, 1994.

L. Macchi, Pragmatic Aspects of the Base-rate Fallacy, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.1, issue.1, pp.188-207, 1995.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.67

L. Macchi, Partitive Formulation of Information in Probabilistic Problems: Beyond Heuristics and Frequency Format Explanations, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.82, issue.2, pp.217-236, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.2000.2895

K. Manktelow, . Df, and K. Clarkson, Reasoning and Thinking An explanation of conservatism in the bookbag-and-pokerchip situation, Acta Psychol, vol.36, pp.145-160, 1972.

C. Mccauley, First things first: What is a base rate?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.4, issue.01, pp.33-34, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(79)90023-4

C. Mccauley and C. Stitt, An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.36, issue.9, pp.929-940, 1978.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.36.9.929

C. Mckenzie, The Accuracy of Intuitive Judgment Strategies: Covariation Assessment and Bayesian Inference, Cognitive Psychology, vol.26, issue.3, pp.209-239, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1994.1007

C. Mckenzie, Base rate versus prior belief in Bayesian inference, Psycoloquy, vol.5, issue.5, 1994.

B. Mellers and P. Mcgraw, How to improve Bayesian reasoning: Comment on Gigerenzer and Hoffrage (1995)., Psychological Review, vol.106, issue.2, pp.417-424, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.417

M. Moldoveanu and L. Langer, False memories of the future: A critique of the applications of probabilistic reasoning to the study of cognitive processes., Psychological Review, vol.109, issue.2, pp.358-375, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.358

L. Moxey and A. Sanford, Communicating quantities: a review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives, Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol.20, issue.3, pp.237-255, 2000.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200005/06)14:3<237::AID-ACP641>3.0.CO;2-R

A. Newell, Reasoning, problem solving and decision processes: The problem space as a fundamental categoryed) Attention and performance, Hillsdale NJ, vol.8, pp.693-718, 1981.

M. Oaksford and N. Chater, Bounded Rationality in Taking Risks and Drawing Inferences, Theory & Psychology, vol.2, issue.2, pp.225-230, 1992.
DOI : 10.1177/0959354392022009

M. Orne, On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications., American Psychologist, vol.17, issue.11, pp.776-783, 1962.
DOI : 10.1037/h0043424

J. Pearl, Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511803161

C. Peterson and L. Beach, Man as an intuitive statistician., Psychological Bulletin, vol.68, issue.1, pp.29-46, 1967.
DOI : 10.1037/h0024722

C. Peterson, Z. Ulehla, A. Miller, L. Bourne, and D. Stilson, Internal consistency of subjective probabilities., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.70, issue.5, pp.526-533, 1965.
DOI : 10.1037/h0022546

L. Phillips, The ???true probability??? problem, Acta Psychologica, vol.34, pp.254-264, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90021-1

L. Phillips and W. Edwards, Conservatism in a simple probability inference task., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.72, issue.3, pp.346-354, 1966.
DOI : 10.1037/h0023653

L. Phillips, W. Hays, and W. Edwards, Conservatism in Complex Probabilistic Inference, IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, vol.7, issue.1, pp.7-18, 1966.
DOI : 10.1109/THFE.1966.231978

M. Piatelli-palmerini, Inevitable illusions, 1993.

G. Politzer, Laws of language use and formal logic, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.33, issue.30, pp.47-92, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01067391

G. Politzer, L'informativité des énoncés: contraintes sur le jugement et le raisonnement. [The informativeness of statements: Constraints on judgment and reasoning], Intellectica, vol.11, pp.11-147, 1991.

G. Politzer and L. Macchi, Reasoning and pragmatics, Mind & Society, vol.51, issue.1, pp.73-94, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02512230

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000615

G. Politzer and L. Macchi, The representation of the task: The case of the Lawyer-Engineer problem The shape of reason. Essays in honour of P. Legrenzi, pp.119-135, 2005.

G. Politzer and I. Noveck, Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations?, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.37, issue.2, pp.83-103, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01067877

F. Ramsey, Truth and probability The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays, Later in Braithwaite RB, pp.156-198, 1926.

A. Rapoport, T. Wallsten, I. Erev, and B. Cohen, Revision of opinion with verbally and numerically expressed uncertainties, Acta Psychologica, vol.74, issue.1, pp.61-79, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90035-E

E. Raufaste, D. Silva-neves, and R. , Empirical evaluation of possibility theory in human radiological diagnosis, Prade H (ed) Proceedings of the 13 th Biennal Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI'98, pp.124-128, 1998.

E. Raufaste, D. Silva-neves, R. Mariné, and C. , Testing the descriptive validity of possibility theory in human judgments of uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence, vol.148, issue.1-2, pp.197-218, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00021-3

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00109814

L. Robinson and R. Hastie, Revision of beliefs when a hypothesis is eliminated from consideration., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.11, issue.4, pp.443-456, 1985.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.11.4.443

N. Roese and J. Olson, What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking, 1995.

R. Rosenkrantz, The Justification of Induction, Philosophy of Science, vol.59, issue.4, pp.527-539, 1992.
DOI : 10.1086/289693

H. Rouanet, Etudes de décisions expérimentales et calcul de la probabilité. [Experimental studies of decision and calculation of the probability, La Décision [Decision]. Editions du CNRS, pp.33-44, 1961.

N. Sahlin, Do people combine evidence according to an evidentiary value model? A note Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory, C.W.K. Gleerups, pp.98-103, 1983.

L. Savage, The Foundations of statistics A note on the consistency between two approaches to incorporate data from unreliable sources in Bayesian analysis, Borcherding K Organ Behav Hum Perf, vol.9, pp.504-508, 1954.

W. Schaeken, D. Vooght, and G. , Deductive reasoning and strategies, 2000.

D. Schum and W. Du-charme, Comments on the relationship between the impact and the reliability of evidence, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.6, issue.2, pp.111-131, 1971.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(71)90008-0

N. Schwarz, Communication and cognition. Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation, 1996.

N. Schwarz, F. Strack, D. Hilton, and G. Naderer, Base Rates, Representativeness, and the Logic of Conversation: The Contextual Relevance of ???Irrelevant??? Information, Social Cognition, vol.9, issue.1, pp.67-83, 1991.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.67

D. Seaver, V. Winterfeldt, D. Edwards, and W. , Eliciting subjective probability distributions on continuous variables, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.21, issue.3, pp.379-391, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90061-2

P. Sedlmeier and G. Gigerenzer, Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.130, issue.3, pp.380-400, 2001.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380

T. Seidenfeld, Why I am not an objective Bayesian; some reflections prompted by Rosenkrantz, Theory and Decision, vol.11, issue.4, pp.413-440, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00139451

G. Shackle, Expectation in Economics., The Philosophical Quarterly, vol.3, issue.13, 1949.
DOI : 10.2307/2217133

G. Shafer, A mathematical theory of evidence, 1976.

G. Shafer, Conditional Probability, International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, vol.53, issue.3, pp.261-277, 1985.
DOI : 10.2307/1402890

G. Shafer and A. Tversky, Languages and Designs for Probability Judgment*, Cognitive Science, vol.238, issue.3, pp.309-316, 1985.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog0903_2

J. Shanteau, An additive model for sequential decision making., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.85, issue.2, pp.181-191, 1970.
DOI : 10.1037/h0029552

B. Skyrms, Choice and chance: An introduction to inductive logic, 1975.

B. Skyrms, Conditional probability, taxicabs, and martingales, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.71, issue.03, pp.351-352, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/2285810

S. Sloman and D. Lagnado, Do We ???do????, Cognitive Science, vol.27, issue.1, pp.5-39, 2005.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog2901_2

P. Slovic and S. Lichtenstein, Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.6, issue.6, pp.649-674, 1971.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-X

J. Smedslund, A critique of Tversky and Kahneman's distinction between fallacy and misunderstanding, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol.9, issue.2, pp.110-120, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037//0033-295X.90.4.293

P. Smets, About Updating (eds) Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Proceedings of the 7 th conference UAI91, pp.387-385, 1991.

E. Smith, E. Shafir, and D. Osherson, Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probability, Cognition, vol.49, issue.1-2, pp.67-69, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90036-U

K. Snapper and D. Fryback, Inferences based on unreliable reports., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.87, issue.3, pp.401-404, 1971.
DOI : 10.1037/h0030554

D. Sperber, C. F. Girotto, and V. , Relevance theory explains the selection task, Cognition, vol.57, issue.1, pp.31-95, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-M

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Relevance: Communication and cognition, 1995.

K. Stanovich and R. West, Discrepancies Between Normative and Descriptive Models of Decision Making and the Understanding/Acceptance Principle, Cognitive Psychology, vol.38, issue.3, pp.349-385, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1998.0700

S. Stich, C. Ma-troutman, and J. Shanteau, The Fragmentation of reason Inferences based on non-diagnostic information, Organ Behav Hum Dec, vol.19, pp.43-55, 1977.

A. Tversky, Assessing Uncertainty, Proc R Stat Soc Ser B, vol.36, pp.148-159, 1974.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, vol.185, issue.4157, pp.1124-1131, 1974.
DOI : 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgment of and by representativeness Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, pp.84-100, 1982.

A. Tversky and D. Koehler, Support theory: A non-extensional representation of subjective probability, Psychol Rev, vol.4, pp.547-567, 1994.

L. Van-wallendael, The quest for limits on noncomplementarity in opinion revision, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.43, issue.3, pp.385-405, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90044-7

L. Van-wallendael and R. Hastie, Tracing the footsteps of Sherlock Holmes: Cognitive representations of hypothesis testing, Memory & Cognition, vol.43, issue.3, pp.240-250, 1990.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03213878

G. Villejoubert and D. Mandel, The inverse fallacy: An account of deviations from Bayes???s theorem and the additivity principle, Memory & Cognition, vol.8, issue.2, pp.171-178, 2002.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03195278

J. Von-neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of games and economic behavior, 1944.

D. Von-winterfeldt and W. Edwards, Decision analysis and behavioral research, 1986.

W. Waller and T. Mitchell, Conditional probability judgments: Effects of imagining vs experiencing the conditioning event, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.49, issue.2, pp.302-325, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90053-V

P. Walley, Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7

B. Walliser and D. Zwirn, Can Bayes' rule be justified by cognitive rationality principles, Theory and Decision, vol.53, issue.2, pp.95-135, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021227106744

T. Wallsten and D. Budescu, State of the Art???Encoding Subjective Probabilities: A Psychological and Psychometric Review, Management Science, vol.29, issue.2, pp.151-173, 1983.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.29.2.151

P. Wang, From inheritance relation to nonaxiomatic logic, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.11, issue.4, pp.281-319, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0888-613X(94)90021-3

P. Wang, Heuristics and normative models of judgment under uncertainty, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.14, issue.4, pp.221-235, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0888-613X(95)00091-T

P. Windschitl, The Binary Additivity of Subjective Probability Does not Indicate the Binary Complementarity of Perceived Certainty, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.81, issue.2, pp.195-225, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.1999.2876

P. Windschitl and G. Wells, Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, vol.2, issue.4, pp.343-364, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/1076-898X.2.4.343

R. Winkler, The Assessment of Prior Distributions in Bayesian Analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.9, issue.319, pp.776-800, 1967.
DOI : 10.2307/1266593

C. Wolfe, Information seeking on Bayesian conditional probability problems: A fuzzy-trace theory account, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol.41, issue.2, pp.85-108, 1995.
DOI : 10.1002/bdm.3960080203

W. Wright, Empirical comparison of subjective probability elicitation methods, Contemporary Accounting Research, vol.70, issue.1, pp.47-57, 1988.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1988.tb00694.x

J. Yates, Judgment and decision making, 1990.

A. Zimmer, Verbal vs. numerical processing of subjective probabilitiesed) Decision making under uncertainty, pp.159-182, 1983.