J. Adler, An optimist's pessimism conversation and conjunction Probability and rationality: Studies on L. Jonathan Cohen's philosophy of science, pp.251-282, 1991.

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes., Psychological Bulletin, vol.82, issue.2, pp.261-277, 1975.
DOI : 10.1037/h0076477

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Use and misuse of Bayes' theorum in causal attribution: Don't attribute it to Ajzen and Fishbein either., Psychological Bulletin, vol.85, issue.2, pp.244-246, 1978.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.85.2.244

M. Allais, Fréquence, probabilité et hasard. [Frequency, probability and chance], J Soc fr stat, pp.70-102, 1983.

M. Anderson and S. Sunder, Professional Traders as Intuitive Bayesians, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.64, issue.2, pp.185-202, 1995.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.1995.1099

N. Anderson, Contributions to information integration theory. Vols 1 and 2, 1991.

J. Baratgin, Is the human mind definitely not Bayesian? A review of the various arguments, Cah Psychol Cogn, vol.21, pp.653-680, 2002.

J. Baratgin, Base rate neglect: A focus on the methodology of the Engineer-Lawyer paradigm Advances in psychology research, pp.183-198, 2002.

J. Baratgin and I. Noveck, Not only base rates are neglected in the Engineer-Lawyer problem: An investigation of reasoners??? underutilization of complementarity, Memory & Cognition, vol.47, issue.1, pp.79-81, 2000.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03211578

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00653810

M. Bar-hillel, The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments, Acta Psychologica, vol.44, issue.3, pp.211-233, 1980.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3

T. Bayes, An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. By the Late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. Communicated by Mr. Price, in a Letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol.53, issue.0, pp.370-418, 1763.
DOI : 10.1098/rstl.1763.0053

A. Beck, Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders, 1976.

R. Beyth-marom and H. Arkes, Ars Conjectandi Thurniciorum fractum Being accurate but not necessarily Bayesian: Comment on Christensen-Szalanski and Beach, Bernoulli J Organ Behav Hum Perf, vol.31, pp.355-357, 1713.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(83)90124-1

M. Birbaum, Base Rates in Bayesian Inference: Signal Detection Analysis of the Cab Problem, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.96, issue.1, pp.85-94, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/1422211

E. Borel, Valeur pratique et philosophie des probabilités. [Practical and philosophical value of probability] In Traité du calcul des probabilités et de ses applications [Treatise of probability calculus and its applications], Treatise of probability calculus and its applications. Gauthiers-Villars, 1939.

D. Budescu, S. Weinberg, and T. Wallsten, Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.14, issue.2, pp.281-294, 1988.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.281

C. Callen, Notes on a grand illusion: Some limits on the use of Bayesian theory in evidence law, Indiana Law J, vol.57, pp.1-44, 1982.

W. Casscells, A. Schoenberger, and T. Grayboys, Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory Results, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.299, issue.18, pp.999-1000, 1978.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM197811022991808

V. Chase, R. Hertwig, and G. Gigerenzer, Visions of rationality, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.2, issue.6, pp.206-214, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01179-6

G. Chesley, Elicitation of subjective probabilities: A review, Accounting Rev, vol.50, pp.325-337, 1975.

J. Christensen-szalanski, The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature., American Psychologist, vol.39, issue.1, pp.75-78, 1984.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.39.1.75

J. Cohen, Chance, skill, and luck. The psychology of guessing and gambling, 1960.

J. Cohen and C. Hansel, La répartition des probabilités subjectives. [The distribution of subjective probability], J Psychol Norm Pathol (Paris), vol.4, pp.431-438, 1957.

L. Cohen, On the psychology of prediction: Whose is the fallacy?, Cognition, vol.7, issue.4, pp.385-402, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(79)90023-4

L. Cohen, Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.70, issue.03, pp.317-331, 1981.
DOI : 10.1037/h0035224

L. Cohen, Are People Programmed to Commit Fallacies? Further Thoughts about the Interpretation of Experimental Data on Probability Judgment, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol.21, issue.4, pp.251-274, 1982.
DOI : 10.1093/mind/LXVII.267.344

P. Cohen, Heuristic reasoning about uncertainty: An artificial intelligence approach, 1985.

L. Cosmides and J. Tooby, Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty, Cognition, vol.58, issue.1, pp.1-73, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8

R. Cox, Probability, Frequency and Reasonable Expectation, American Journal of Physics, vol.14, issue.1, pp.1-13, 1946.
DOI : 10.1119/1.1990764

S. Curley and J. Golden, Using Belief Functions to Represent Degrees of Belief, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.58, issue.2, pp.271-303, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.1994.1037

D. Silva-neves, R. Raufaste, and E. , Polymorphism of human judgment under uncertainty Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty, pp.647-658, 2001.

D. Davidson and S. Hirtle, Effects of Nondiscrepant and Discrepant Information on the Use of Base Rates, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.103, issue.3, pp.343-357, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/1423214

D. Davis and C. Holt, Experimental Economics, 1993.

D. Zeeuw, G. Wagenaar, and W. , Are subjective probabilities probabilities? In von Holstein CS (ed) The concept of probability in psychological experiments, pp.73-101, 1974.

B. De-finetti, Fondamenti logici del ragionamento probabilistico. [The logical foundations of probabilistic reasoning], B Unione Mat Ital, vol.9, pp.258-261, 1930.

B. De-finetti, Rôle et domaine d'application du théorème de Bayes selon les différents points de vue sur les probabilités. [Role and domains of application of Bayes' theorem according to the various viewpoints on probability]. Colloque de calcul des probabilités, pp.67-82, 1951.

B. De-finetti, Les problèmes psychologiques sur les probabilités subjectives. [The psychological problems on subjective probabilities], J Psychol Norm Pathol, vol.2, pp.253-259, 1955.

B. De-finetti, L'informazione, il ragionamento, l'inconscio nei rapporti con la previsione. [Information, reasoning and the unconscious in connection with forecast], pp.3-27, 1957.

B. De-finetti, Dans quel sens la théorie de la décision est-elle et doit être « normative ». [In what sense decision theory is, and should be, La Décision [Decision]. Editions du CNRS, pp.159-169, 1961.

B. De-finetti, Does it make sense to speak of " good probability appraisers " ? In Good IG (ed) The scientist speculates, pp.357-364, 1962.

B. De-finetti, La décision et les probabilities. [Decision and probability], Rev. math. pures. appl, vol.3, pp.405-413, 1963.

B. De-finetti, Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources Studies in subjective probability, pp.53-118, 1937.

B. De-finetti, La probabilità: guida nel pensare e nell'agire. [Probability: A guide to think and act, 1965.

B. De-finetti, Logical foundations and measurement of subjective probability, Acta Psychologica, vol.34, pp.129-145, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90012-0

B. De-finetti, Probability, statistics and induction: Their relationship according to the various points of view In de Finetti B, Probability, induction and statistics. The art of guessing, pp.141-228, 1959.

B. De-finetti, The value of studying subjective evaluation of probability The concept of probability in psychological experiments, pp.3-14, 1974.

B. De-finetti, The true subjective probability problem The concept of probability in psychological experiments, pp.15-23, 1974.

B. De-finetti, Probability: Beware of falsifications, Scientia, vol.111, pp.56-79, 1976.

B. De-finetti, Theory of probability, 1970.
DOI : 10.1002/9781119286387

B. De-finetti, On the subjective meaning of probability, Probabilità e induzione. Clueb, pp.291-321, 1931.

B. De-finetti and L. Savage, Sul modo di scegliere le probabilità iniziali. [On the ways of selecting prior probabilities], Fondamenti della statistica [Foundations of statistics]. Biblioteca del Metron, Serie C: Note e Commenti, pp.81-154, 1962.

L. Dodson, Simulation system design for a TEAS simulation research facility. Planning Research Corporation, 1112.

D. Dubois and H. Prade, Possibility theory. An approach to computerized processing of uncertainty, 1985.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01136336

D. Dubois and H. Prade, Modelling uncertainty and inductive inference: A survey of recent non-additive probability systems, Acta Psychologica, vol.68, issue.1-3, pp.53-78, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90045-5

D. Dubois and H. Prade, A survey of belief revision and updating rules in various uncertainty models, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol.52, issue.1, pp.61-100, 1994.
DOI : 10.1002/int.4550090105

R. Duh and S. Sunder, Incentives, learning and processing of information in a market environment: An examination of the base-rate fallacy, pp.50-79, 1986.

D. Dulany and D. Hilton, Conversational Implicature, Conscious Representation, and the Conjunction Fallacy, Social Cognition, vol.9, issue.1, pp.85-100, 1991.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.85

J. Earman, Bayes or Bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory, 1995.

W. Edwards, The theory of decision making., Psychological Bulletin, vol.51, issue.4, pp.380-417, 1954.
DOI : 10.1037/h0053870

W. Edwards, Conservatism in human processinged) Formal representation of human judgment, pp.17-52, 1968.

W. Edwards, Human cognitive capabilities, representativeness, and ground rules for research Analyzing and aiding decision processes, pp.507-513, 1983.

W. Edwards, H. Lindman, and L. Savage, Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research., Psychological Review, vol.70, issue.3, pp.193-242, 1963.
DOI : 10.1037/h0044139

W. Edwards and L. Phillips, Man as transducer for probabilities in Bayesian command and control system Human judgments and optimality, pp.17-52, 1964.

H. Einhorn and R. Hogarth, Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and Choice, Annual Review of Psychology, vol.32, issue.1, pp.53-88, 1981.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413

I. Erev and B. Cohen, Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.45, issue.1, pp.1-18, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90002-Q

E. Jstbt, P. Brooks, and P. Pollard, Prior beliefs and statistical inference, Brit J Psychol, vol.76, pp.469-477, 1985.

B. Fischhoff and R. Beyth-marom, Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective., Psychological Review, vol.90, issue.3, pp.239-260, 1983.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.239

B. Fischhoff and S. Lichtenstein, Don't attribute this to Reverend Bayes., Psychological Bulletin, vol.85, issue.2, pp.239-243, 1978.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.85.2.239

J. Fisk and N. Pidgeon, Conditional probabilities, potential surprise, and the conjunction fallacy, Q J Exp Psychol, vol.51, pp.655-681, 1998.

M. Fréchet, Rapport général sur les travaux du colloque de calcul des probabilités. [General report on the work of the Conference on the probability calculus, Colloque de calcul des probabilités. [Conference on probabilities calculus]. Editions du CNRS, pp.1-21, 1951.

M. Fréchet, Un problème psychologique sur les probabilités subjectives irrationnelles. [A psychological problem on irrational subjective probabilities], J Psychol Norm Pathol, vol.1, pp.431-438, 1954.

M. Fréchet, Remarques sur l'article de M. de Finetti. [Remarks on Mr. de Finetti's article], J Psychol Norm Pathol, vol.2, pp.260-261, 1955.

A. Freeling and N. Sahlin, Combining evidence Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory, C.W.K. Gleerups, pp.58-74, 1983.

J. Funaro, An empirical analysis of five descriptive models for cascaded inference, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.14, issue.2, pp.186-206, 1975.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90023-9

P. Gärdenfors, Probabilistic reasoning and evidentiary value Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory, C.W.K. Gleerups, pp.44-57, 1983.

P. Gärdenfors, Knowledge in flux, modeling the dynamics of epistemic states, 1988.

P. Gärdenfors, Belief revision Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory, 1983.

C. Gettys, C. Kelly, and C. Peterson, The best guess hypothesis in multistage inference, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.10, issue.3, pp.364-373, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90024-X

C. Gettys, C. Michel, J. Steiger, C. Kelly, and C. Peterson, Multiple-stage probabilistic information processing, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.10, issue.3, pp.374-387, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90025-1

C. Gettys, A model for which Dodson's algorithm is appropriate, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.10, issue.3, pp.424-426, 1973.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90028-7

C. Gettys and T. Wilke, The application of Bayes's theorem when the true data state is uncertain, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.4, issue.2, pp.125-141, 1969.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(69)90003-8

G. Gigerenzer, On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky., Psychological Review, vol.103, issue.3, pp.592-596, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592

G. Gigerenzer, W. Hell, and H. Blank, Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.14, issue.3, pp.513-525, 1988.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.513

G. Gigerenzer and U. Hoffrage, How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats., Psychological Review, vol.102, issue.4, pp.684-704, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.128.3201

G. Gigerenzer and D. Murray, Cognition as intuitive statistics, 1987.

G. Gigerenzer and P. Todd, The ABC Research Group (eds) (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart

D. Gillies, Was Bayes a Bayesian?, Historia Mathematica, vol.14, issue.4, pp.325-346, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0315-0860(87)90065-6

V. Girotto, Il ragionamento Il Mulino, Bologna González-Vallejo CC, Erev I, Wallsten TS (1994) Do decision quality and preference order depend on whether probabilities are verbal or numerical?, Am J Psychol, vol.107, pp.157-172, 1994.

I. Good, Probability and the weighing of evidence. C. Griffin, London Good IJ (1971) 46656 varieties of Bayesians, Amer Statistician, vol.25, pp.62-63, 1950.

I. Good, Explicativity, corroboration, and the relative odds of hypotheses, Synthese, vol.42, issue.6, pp.39-73, 1975.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00485294

I. Good, The Bayesian influence, or how to sweep subjectivism under the carpet Foundations of probability theory, statistical inference, and statistical theories of science, Proceedings of a Conference in May, pp.125-174, 1973.

P. Grice, Studies in the way of words, 1989.

D. Griffin and A. Tversky, The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence, Cognitive Psychology, vol.24, issue.3, pp.411-435, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-R

I. Hacking, The emergence of probability: A philosophy study of early ideas about probability, induction, and statistical inference, 1975.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511817557

M. Hammerton, A case of radical probability estimation., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.101, issue.2, pp.252-254, 1973.
DOI : 10.1037/h0035224

K. Hammond, Probabilistic functioning and the clinical method., Psychological Review, vol.62, issue.4, pp.255-262, 1955.
DOI : 10.1037/h0046845

D. Hilton, The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment., Psychological Bulletin, vol.118, issue.2, pp.248-271, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.248

U. Hoffrage, G. Gigerenzer, S. Krauss, and L. Martignon, Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not, Cognition, vol.84, issue.3, pp.343-352, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00050-1

URL : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ShoppingCartURL&_method=add&_eid=1-s2.0-S0010027702000501&originContentFamily=serial&_origin=article&_ts=1480637342&md5=4a335b26a5424cce7775a239231d1b7f

C. Hooker and W. Harper, Foundations of probability theory, statistical inference, and statistical theories of science, Proceedings of a Conference in May, 1973.

E. Jaynes, Probability theory: The logic of science, 1994.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511790423

R. Jeffrey, The logic of decision Theory of probability The two camps on rationality, Scholz RW (ed) Decision making under uncertainty, pp.627-641, 1931.

D. Kahneman and D. Miller, Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives., Psychological Review, vol.93, issue.2, pp.136-153, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, On prediction and judgment, ORI (Oregon Research Institute), vol.12, issue.5, 1972.

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness, Cognitive Psychology, vol.3, issue.3, pp.430-450, 1972.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, On the psychology of prediction., Psychological Review, vol.80, issue.4, pp.237-251, 1973.
DOI : 10.1037/h0034747

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Can irrationality be intelligently discussed?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.4, issue.03, pp.509-510, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90019-1

D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, 1982.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511809477

H. Katsuno and A. Mendelzon, On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising ited) Belief revision, pp.183-203, 1992.

D. Kaye, Introduction. What is Bayesianism? Probability and inference in the law of evidence: The uses and limits of Bayesianism, Kluwer Academic, pp.1-20, 1988.

J. Koehler, The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.13, issue.01, pp.1-53, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.75

S. Kripke, Semantical analysis of modal logic, Z Math Logik, vol.9, pp.62-67, 1962.

J. Krosnick, F. Li, and D. Lehman, Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and individuating information on social judgments., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.59, issue.6, pp.1140-1152, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1140

H. Kyburg, Intuition, competence, and performance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.65, issue.03, pp.341-342, 1961.
DOI : 10.1126/science.7455683

H. Kyburg, Rational belief, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.6, issue.02, pp.231-273, 1983.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413

H. Kyburg, Higher order probabilities and intervals, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.2, issue.3, pp.195-209, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0888-613X(88)90116-8

P. Laplace, Memoir on " probability of causes " . (transl, SM Stigler) Stat Sci, vol.1, pp.359-378, 1986.

M. Leon and N. Anderson, A ratio rule from integration theory applied to inference judgments., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.102, issue.1, pp.27-36, 1974.
DOI : 10.1037/h0035677

I. Levi, Should Bayesians sometimes neglect base rates?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.68, issue.03, pp.341-342, 1981.
DOI : 10.1037/h0029790

I. Levi, Who commits the base rate fallacy?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.4, issue.03, pp.502-506, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3

I. Levi, ILLUSIONS ABOUT UNCERTAINTY, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol.36, issue.3, pp.331-340, 1985.
DOI : 10.1093/bjps/36.3.331

C. Lewis and K. G. , On the difficulties underlying Bayesian reasoning: A comment on Gigerenzer and Hoffrage., Psychological Review, vol.106, issue.2, pp.411-416, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.411

D. Lewis, Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities, Psychol Rev, vol.3, pp.297-315, 1976.

J. Logue, Projective probability. Oxford Philosophical Monographs, 1995.

L. Lopes, Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian inference, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, vol.8, issue.6, pp.509-512, 1985.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03329868

L. Lopes, The Rhetoric of Irrationality, Theory & Psychology, vol.1, issue.1, pp.65-82, 1991.
DOI : 10.1177/0959354391011005

L. Macchi, On the communication and comprehension of probabilistic information: Commentary on Koehler on base-rate, Psycoloquy, vol.5, issue.11, 1994.

L. Macchi, Pragmatic Aspects of the Base-rate Fallacy, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, vol.1, issue.1, pp.188-207, 1995.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.67

L. Macchi, Partitive Formulation of Information in Probabilistic Problems: Beyond Heuristics and Frequency Format Explanations, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.82, issue.2, pp.217-236, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.2000.2895

K. Manktelow, . Df, and K. Clarkson, Reasoning and Thinking An explanation of conservatism in the bookbag-and-pokerchip situation, Acta Psychol, vol.36, pp.145-160, 1972.

C. Mccauley, First things first: What is a base rate?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.4, issue.01, pp.33-34, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(79)90023-4

C. Mccauley and C. Stitt, An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.36, issue.9, pp.929-940, 1978.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.36.9.929

C. Mckenzie, The Accuracy of Intuitive Judgment Strategies: Covariation Assessment and Bayesian Inference, Cognitive Psychology, vol.26, issue.3, pp.209-239, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1994.1007

C. Mckenzie, Base rate versus prior belief in Bayesian inference, Psycoloquy, vol.5, issue.5, 1994.

B. Mellers and P. Mcgraw, How to improve Bayesian reasoning: Comment on Gigerenzer and Hoffrage (1995)., Psychological Review, vol.106, issue.2, pp.417-424, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.417

M. Moldoveanu and L. Langer, False memories of the future: A critique of the applications of probabilistic reasoning to the study of cognitive processes., Psychological Review, vol.109, issue.2, pp.358-375, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.358

L. Moxey and A. Sanford, Communicating quantities: a review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives, Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol.20, issue.3, pp.237-255, 2000.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200005/06)14:3<237::AID-ACP641>3.0.CO;2-R

A. Newell, Reasoning, problem solving and decision processes: The problem space as a fundamental categoryed) Attention and performance, Hillsdale NJ, vol.8, pp.693-718, 1981.

M. Oaksford and N. Chater, Bounded Rationality in Taking Risks and Drawing Inferences, Theory & Psychology, vol.2, issue.2, pp.225-230, 1992.
DOI : 10.1177/0959354392022009

M. Orne, On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications., American Psychologist, vol.17, issue.11, pp.776-783, 1962.
DOI : 10.1037/h0043424

J. Pearl, Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511803161

C. Peterson and L. Beach, Man as an intuitive statistician., Psychological Bulletin, vol.68, issue.1, pp.29-46, 1967.
DOI : 10.1037/h0024722

C. Peterson, Z. Ulehla, A. Miller, L. Bourne, and D. Stilson, Internal consistency of subjective probabilities., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.70, issue.5, pp.526-533, 1965.
DOI : 10.1037/h0022546

L. Phillips, The ???true probability??? problem, Acta Psychologica, vol.34, pp.254-264, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90021-1

L. Phillips and W. Edwards, Conservatism in a simple probability inference task., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.72, issue.3, pp.346-354, 1966.
DOI : 10.1037/h0023653

L. Phillips, W. Hays, and W. Edwards, Conservatism in Complex Probabilistic Inference, IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, vol.7, issue.1, pp.7-18, 1966.
DOI : 10.1109/THFE.1966.231978

M. Piatelli-palmerini, Inevitable illusions, 1993.

G. Politzer, Laws of language use and formal logic, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.33, issue.30, pp.47-92, 1986.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01067391

G. Politzer, L'informativité des énoncés: contraintes sur le jugement et le raisonnement. [The informativeness of statements: Constraints on judgment and reasoning], Intellectica, vol.11, pp.11-147, 1991.

G. Politzer and L. Macchi, Reasoning and pragmatics, Mind & Society, vol.51, issue.1, pp.73-94, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02512230

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000615

G. Politzer and L. Macchi, The representation of the task: The case of the Lawyer-Engineer problem The shape of reason. Essays in honour of P. Legrenzi, pp.119-135, 2005.

G. Politzer and I. Noveck, Are conjunction rule violations the result of conversational rule violations?, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.37, issue.2, pp.83-103, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01067877

F. Ramsey, Truth and probability The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays, Later in Braithwaite RB, pp.156-198, 1926.

A. Rapoport, T. Wallsten, I. Erev, and B. Cohen, Revision of opinion with verbally and numerically expressed uncertainties, Acta Psychologica, vol.74, issue.1, pp.61-79, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90035-E

E. Raufaste, D. Silva-neves, and R. , Empirical evaluation of possibility theory in human radiological diagnosis, Prade H (ed) Proceedings of the 13 th Biennal Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI'98, pp.124-128, 1998.

E. Raufaste, D. Silva-neves, R. Mariné, and C. , Testing the descriptive validity of possibility theory in human judgments of uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence, vol.148, issue.1-2, pp.197-218, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00021-3

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00109814

L. Robinson and R. Hastie, Revision of beliefs when a hypothesis is eliminated from consideration., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.11, issue.4, pp.443-456, 1985.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.11.4.443

N. Roese and J. Olson, What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking, 1995.

R. Rosenkrantz, The Justification of Induction, Philosophy of Science, vol.59, issue.4, pp.527-539, 1992.
DOI : 10.1086/289693

H. Rouanet, Etudes de décisions expérimentales et calcul de la probabilité. [Experimental studies of decision and calculation of the probability, La Décision [Decision]. Editions du CNRS, pp.33-44, 1961.

N. Sahlin, Do people combine evidence according to an evidentiary value model? A note Evidentiary value: Philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory, C.W.K. Gleerups, pp.98-103, 1983.

L. Savage, The Foundations of statistics A note on the consistency between two approaches to incorporate data from unreliable sources in Bayesian analysis, Borcherding K Organ Behav Hum Perf, vol.9, pp.504-508, 1954.

W. Schaeken, D. Vooght, and G. , Deductive reasoning and strategies, 2000.

D. Schum and W. Du-charme, Comments on the relationship between the impact and the reliability of evidence, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.6, issue.2, pp.111-131, 1971.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(71)90008-0

N. Schwarz, Communication and cognition. Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation, 1996.

N. Schwarz, F. Strack, D. Hilton, and G. Naderer, Base Rates, Representativeness, and the Logic of Conversation: The Contextual Relevance of ???Irrelevant??? Information, Social Cognition, vol.9, issue.1, pp.67-83, 1991.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.67

D. Seaver, V. Winterfeldt, D. Edwards, and W. , Eliciting subjective probability distributions on continuous variables, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.21, issue.3, pp.379-391, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90061-2

P. Sedlmeier and G. Gigerenzer, Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.130, issue.3, pp.380-400, 2001.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380

T. Seidenfeld, Why I am not an objective Bayesian; some reflections prompted by Rosenkrantz, Theory and Decision, vol.11, issue.4, pp.413-440, 1979.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00139451

G. Shackle, Expectation in Economics., The Philosophical Quarterly, vol.3, issue.13, 1949.
DOI : 10.2307/2217133

G. Shafer, A mathematical theory of evidence, 1976.

G. Shafer, Conditional Probability, International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, vol.53, issue.3, pp.261-277, 1985.
DOI : 10.2307/1402890

G. Shafer and A. Tversky, Languages and Designs for Probability Judgment*, Cognitive Science, vol.238, issue.3, pp.309-316, 1985.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog0903_2

J. Shanteau, An additive model for sequential decision making., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.85, issue.2, pp.181-191, 1970.
DOI : 10.1037/h0029552

B. Skyrms, Choice and chance: An introduction to inductive logic, 1975.

B. Skyrms, Conditional probability, taxicabs, and martingales, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.71, issue.03, pp.351-352, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/2285810

S. Sloman and D. Lagnado, Do We ???do????, Cognitive Science, vol.27, issue.1, pp.5-39, 2005.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog2901_2

P. Slovic and S. Lichtenstein, Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol.6, issue.6, pp.649-674, 1971.
DOI : 10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-X

J. Smedslund, A critique of Tversky and Kahneman's distinction between fallacy and misunderstanding, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol.9, issue.2, pp.110-120, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037//0033-295X.90.4.293

P. Smets, About Updating (eds) Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Proceedings of the 7 th conference UAI91, pp.387-385, 1991.

E. Smith, E. Shafir, and D. Osherson, Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probability, Cognition, vol.49, issue.1-2, pp.67-69, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90036-U

K. Snapper and D. Fryback, Inferences based on unreliable reports., Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.87, issue.3, pp.401-404, 1971.
DOI : 10.1037/h0030554

D. Sperber, C. F. Girotto, and V. , Relevance theory explains the selection task, Cognition, vol.57, issue.1, pp.31-95, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-M

D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Relevance: Communication and cognition, 1995.

K. Stanovich and R. West, Discrepancies Between Normative and Descriptive Models of Decision Making and the Understanding/Acceptance Principle, Cognitive Psychology, vol.38, issue.3, pp.349-385, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1998.0700

S. Stich, C. Ma-troutman, and J. Shanteau, The Fragmentation of reason Inferences based on non-diagnostic information, Organ Behav Hum Dec, vol.19, pp.43-55, 1977.

A. Tversky, Assessing Uncertainty, Proc R Stat Soc Ser B, vol.36, pp.148-159, 1974.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, vol.185, issue.4157, pp.1124-1131, 1974.
DOI : 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgment of and by representativeness Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, pp.84-100, 1982.

A. Tversky and D. Koehler, Support theory: A non-extensional representation of subjective probability, Psychol Rev, vol.4, pp.547-567, 1994.

L. Van-wallendael, The quest for limits on noncomplementarity in opinion revision, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.43, issue.3, pp.385-405, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90044-7

L. Van-wallendael and R. Hastie, Tracing the footsteps of Sherlock Holmes: Cognitive representations of hypothesis testing, Memory & Cognition, vol.43, issue.3, pp.240-250, 1990.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03213878

G. Villejoubert and D. Mandel, The inverse fallacy: An account of deviations from Bayes???s theorem and the additivity principle, Memory & Cognition, vol.8, issue.2, pp.171-178, 2002.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03195278

J. Von-neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of games and economic behavior, 1944.

D. Von-winterfeldt and W. Edwards, Decision analysis and behavioral research, 1986.

W. Waller and T. Mitchell, Conditional probability judgments: Effects of imagining vs experiencing the conditioning event, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.49, issue.2, pp.302-325, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90053-V

P. Walley, Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7

B. Walliser and D. Zwirn, Can Bayes' rule be justified by cognitive rationality principles, Theory and Decision, vol.53, issue.2, pp.95-135, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021227106744

T. Wallsten and D. Budescu, State of the Art???Encoding Subjective Probabilities: A Psychological and Psychometric Review, Management Science, vol.29, issue.2, pp.151-173, 1983.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.29.2.151

P. Wang, From inheritance relation to nonaxiomatic logic, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.11, issue.4, pp.281-319, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0888-613X(94)90021-3

P. Wang, Heuristics and normative models of judgment under uncertainty, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.14, issue.4, pp.221-235, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0888-613X(95)00091-T

P. Windschitl, The Binary Additivity of Subjective Probability Does not Indicate the Binary Complementarity of Perceived Certainty, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.81, issue.2, pp.195-225, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.1999.2876

P. Windschitl and G. Wells, Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, vol.2, issue.4, pp.343-364, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/1076-898X.2.4.343

R. Winkler, The Assessment of Prior Distributions in Bayesian Analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.9, issue.319, pp.776-800, 1967.
DOI : 10.2307/1266593

C. Wolfe, Information seeking on Bayesian conditional probability problems: A fuzzy-trace theory account, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol.41, issue.2, pp.85-108, 1995.
DOI : 10.1002/bdm.3960080203

W. Wright, Empirical comparison of subjective probability elicitation methods, Contemporary Accounting Research, vol.70, issue.1, pp.47-57, 1988.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1988.tb00694.x

J. Yates, Judgment and decision making, 1990.

A. Zimmer, Verbal vs. numerical processing of subjective probabilitiesed) Decision making under uncertainty, pp.159-182, 1983.