Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Against the Contingent A Priori

Abstract : Since Saul Kripke's Naming and Necessity, the view that there are contingent a priori truths has been surprisingly widespread. In this paper, I argue against that view. My first point is that in general, occurrences of predicates “a priori” and “contingent” are implicitly relativized to some circumstance, involving an agent, a time, a location. My second point is that a priority entails necessity, whenever the two are relativized to the same circumstance. In other words, what is known to be the case a priori (by an agent in a circumstance) could not fail to be the case (in the same circumstance), hence is necessary.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [1 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00196469
Contributor : Isidora Stojanovic <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, December 12, 2007 - 6:10:11 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, September 22, 2020 - 3:58:35 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Monday, April 12, 2010 - 7:13:30 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : ijn_00196469, version 1

Collections

Citation

Isidora Stojanovic. Against the Contingent A Priori. 2007. ⟨ijn_00196469⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

298

Files downloads

661