Question-Embedding and Factivity [paper]

Abstract : Attitude verbs fall in different categories depending on the kind of complements which they can embed. In English, a verb like know takes both declarative and interrogative complements. By contrast, believe takes only declarative complements and wonder takes only interrogative complements. The present paper examines the hypothesis, originally put forward by Hintikka 1975, that the only verbs that can take both that-complements and whether-complements are the factive verbs. I argue that at least one half of the hypothesis is empirically correct, namely that all veridical attitude verbs taking that-complements take whether-complements. I distinguish veridical verbs from factive verbs, and present one way of deriving the generalization. Counterexamples to both directions of the factivity hypothesis are discussed, in particular the case of emotive factive verbs like regret, and the case of nonveridical verbs that licence whether-complements, in particular tell, guess, decide and agree. Alternative accounts are discussed along the way, in particular Zuber (1982), Ginzburg (1995) and Saebo (2006).
Type de document :
Pré-publication, Document de travail
First version. (as of 11/18/2007) NB. Some references are still missing). 2008
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00226386
Contributeur : Paul Egré <>
Soumis le : mercredi 30 janvier 2008 - 15:44:40
Dernière modification le : mercredi 28 septembre 2016 - 15:41:08
Document(s) archivé(s) le : vendredi 30 avril 2010 - 20:00:02

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ijn_00226386, version 1

Collections

Citation

Paul Egré. Question-Embedding and Factivity [paper]. First version. (as of 11/18/2007) NB. Some references are still missing). 2008. <ijn_00226386>

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de
la notice

416

Téléchargements du document

509