Declarative vs. procedural rules for religious controversy Is Leibniz's rational approach to heresy an example of procedural rationality?

Abstract : I propose to employ the conceptual contrast between procedural knowledge and declarative knowledge instead of the contrast stressed by Marcelo Dascal (2001, 2005) between soft and hard rationality in Leibniz's thought. I propose to examine the interplay between declarative and procedural knowledge in Leibniz's religious thought, and in particular Leibniz's approach to heresy.
Type de document :
Chapitre d'ouvrage
Marcelo Dascal. Leibniz: What kind of Rationalist ?, Springer, pp.000-000, 2007, chap. 24
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00352708
Contributeur : Frédéric Nef <>
Soumis le : mardi 13 janvier 2009 - 15:34:09
Dernière modification le : mardi 24 avril 2018 - 17:20:08
Document(s) archivé(s) le : mardi 8 juin 2010 - 17:18:55

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : ijn_00352708, version 1

Collections

Citation

Frédéric Nef. Declarative vs. procedural rules for religious controversy Is Leibniz's rational approach to heresy an example of procedural rationality?. Marcelo Dascal. Leibniz: What kind of Rationalist ?, Springer, pp.000-000, 2007, chap. 24. 〈ijn_00352708〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

175

Téléchargements de fichiers

265