. Peacocke, However, they also introduce a reliability requirement of belief-formation, Brewer, 2001.

. Mcdowell, For an analysis of the conceptualist picture of normativity, see Echeverri (submitted) 11 In fact, many critics think that one could counter McDowell's argument by advocating a form of externalism This response cannot satisfy the conceptualist picture of normativity 13) acknowledges the 'internalist' orientation of this line of argument. 12 'That is what I mean by 'a minimal empiricism': the idea that experience must constitute a tribunal, mediating the way our thinking is answerable to how things are, as it must be if we are to make sense of it as thinking at all' (McDowell 1996: xii) In his McDowell provides further arguments against Davidson's view. I examine them in Echeverri (in preparation) 13 Brewer (1999, 2005) defends a similar view. Both theories differ from Noë's 1999 conceptualism, since he introduces concepts at the level of judgment. For a recent pronouncement on the pre-judgmental actualization of concepts, see McDowell 2008b: 228-ff. 14 For a discussion of this aspect of McDowell's view, in relation to Jennifer Hornsby's developments of the identity conception of truth, see Dodd 144) acknowledges this point The main difficulty is to preserve the non-inferential character of perception without falling in a version of the Myth. However, not all theorists understand immediacy as synonymous with non-inferential 18 This condition is dropped in McDowell's more recent formulation of conceptualism, pp.158-59, 1994.

R. Brandom, Mind and World, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol.58, issue.2, pp.369-374, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/2653516

B. Brewer, Perception and Reason, 1999.

D. Davidson, Empirical Content', Grazer Philosophische Studien, pp.16-17, 1982.

W. A. Devries, McDowell, Sellars, and Sense Impressions, Sellars, and Sense Impressions, pp.182-201, 2006.
DOI : 10.2307/2181906

S. M. Dingli, On Thinking and the World: John McDowell's 'Mind and World, 2005.

J. Dodd, An Identity Theory of Truth, 2000.

J. Dokic, Perception as Openness to Facts', Facta philosophica, pp.95-112, 2000.

F. Dretske, Entitlement: Epistemic Rights without Epistemic Duties?, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol.60, issue.3, pp.591-606, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/2653817

S. Echeverri, The Myth of the Conceptual Given
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00452614

P. Engel, The False Modesty of the Identity Theory of Truth, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, vol.9, issue.4, pp.441-58, 2001.
DOI : 10.1080/09672550110081249

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000317

G. Evans, The Varieties of Reference, 1982.

M. Friedman, Exorcising the Philosophical Tradition: Comments on John McDowell's Mind and World', The Philosophical Review, pp.427-67, 1996.

R. Gaskin, Experience and the World's Own Language, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/0199287252.001.0001

C. Peacocke, Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content?, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.98, issue.5, pp.239-64, 2001.
DOI : 10.2307/2678383

D. Pritchard, McDowell on Reasons, Externalism and Scepticism, European Journal of Philosophy, vol.10, issue.3, pp.273-94, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9973.00263

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.188.9875

J. Pryor, The Skeptic and the Dogmatist', Noû s, pp.517-566, 2000.

W. Sellars, Sellars (1997) Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (With an Introduction by Richard Rorty and a Study Guide by Robert Brandom), Philosophy of Mind, Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol.1, 1956.

L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness, 1921.

C. Wright, (Anti-)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol.10, issue.2, pp.330-378, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/mind/C.397.87