Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Humiliation and the Inertia Effect: Implications for Understanding Violence and Compromise in Intractable Intergroup Conflicts

Abstract : We investigated the influence of humiliation on inter-group conflict in three studies of Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza. We demonstrate that experienced humiliation produces an inertia effect; a tendency towards inaction that suppresses rebellious or violent action but which paradoxically also suppresses support for acts of inter-group compromise. In Study 1, Palestinians who felt more humiliated by the Israeli occupation were less likely to support suicide attacks against Israelis. In Study 2, priming Palestinians with a humiliating experience caused fewer expressions of joy when subsequently hearing about suicide attacks. In Study 3, Palestinians who felt more humiliated by peace deals were less likely to support those deals, while Israeli symbolic compromises that decreased feelings of humiliation increased support for the same deals. While the experience of humiliation does not seem to contribute to political violence, it does seem to suppress support for conflict resolution
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [37 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_00505189
Contributor : Scott Atran <>
Submitted on : Thursday, July 22, 2010 - 8:35:43 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, September 22, 2020 - 3:57:59 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, December 1, 2016 - 10:22:03 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : ijn_00505189, version 1

Collections

Citation

Jeremy Ginges, Scott Atran. Humiliation and the Inertia Effect: Implications for Understanding Violence and Compromise in Intractable Intergroup Conflicts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, Brill Academic Publishers, 2008, 8, pp.281-294. ⟨ijn_00505189⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

615

Files downloads

1338