B. Abbott, Support for Individual Concepts, Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, vol.10, pp.1-23, 2011.

C. Chastain, Reference and Context, Language, Mind, and Knowledge, pp.194-269, 1975.

K. Donnellan, Reference and Definite Descriptions, 1966.

K. Donnellan, Speaker Reference, Descriptions, and Anaphora, Syntax and Semantics, vol.9, pp.47-68, 1978.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199857999.003.0005

G. Evans, The Varieties of Reference, 1982.

P. Geach, Reference and Generality, 1962.

P. Grice, Vacuous Names, pp.118-163, 1969.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-010-1709-1_9

D. Kaplan, An Idea of Donnellan, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199844845.003.0008

S. Kripke, SPEAKER'S REFERENCE and SEMANTIC REFERENCE, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol.2, issue.1, pp.255-76, 1977.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1977.tb00045.x

S. Kripke, A Puzzle About Belief, pp.239-83, 1979.

G. Martì, Direct Reference and Definite Descriptions, Dialectica, vol.37, issue.26, pp.43-57, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2008.01138.x

J. Mcdowell, Evans's Frege *, Thought, Reference, and Experience : Themes From the Philosophy of Gareth Evans, pp.42-65, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248964.003.0002

S. Neale, Bradford Books. it to refer to But the two ideas can be reconciled by appealing to the notion of public file (a notion I think we need anyway) : we can say that the reference of a name ? i.e. the name's semantic reference ? is the reference of the public file associated with it, the Smith/Jones case, the public file associated with the name 'Jones' refers to Jones (and does so in virtue of relational factors), while the demonstrative file deployed by the speaker who mistakenly thinks he sees Jones refers to Smith, 1990.