Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Passive Consensus and Active Commitment in the Sciences

Abstract : Gilbert (2000) examined the issue of collective intentionality in science. Her paper consisted of a conceptual analysis of the negative role of collective belief, consensus, and joint commit-ment in science, with a brief discussion of a case study investigated by Thagard (1998a, 1998b). I argue that Gilbert’s concepts have to be refined to be empirically more relevant. Specifically, I distinguish between different kinds of joint commitments. I base my analysis on a close examination of Thagard’s example, the discovery of Helicobacter pylori, and two other historical cases involving the Copenhagen school of quantum mechanics and the Austri-an school of economics. I also argue that it is difficult to fulfill the condition of common knowledge, even in Gilbert’s weak sense. I conclude by raising serious doubts about the very possibility of a certain type of joint commitment which I refer to as an implicit joint commit-ment.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [31 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Alban Bouvier <>
Submitted on : Friday, November 7, 2014 - 6:27:27 PM
Last modification on : Friday, July 2, 2021 - 9:58:02 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, February 8, 2015 - 11:11:17 AM


Episteme HAL proof version.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)




Alban Bouvier. Passive Consensus and Active Commitment in the Sciences. Episteme, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2010, 7, pp.185 - 197. ⟨10.3366/E1742360010000936⟩. ⟨ijn_01081440⟩



Record views


Files downloads