Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Passive Consensus and Active Commitment in the Sciences

Abstract : Gilbert (2000) examined the issue of collective intentionality in science. Her paper consisted of a conceptual analysis of the negative role of collective belief, consensus, and joint commit-ment in science, with a brief discussion of a case study investigated by Thagard (1998a, 1998b). I argue that Gilbert’s concepts have to be refined to be empirically more relevant. Specifically, I distinguish between different kinds of joint commitments. I base my analysis on a close examination of Thagard’s example, the discovery of Helicobacter pylori, and two other historical cases involving the Copenhagen school of quantum mechanics and the Austri-an school of economics. I also argue that it is difficult to fulfill the condition of common knowledge, even in Gilbert’s weak sense. I conclude by raising serious doubts about the very possibility of a certain type of joint commitment which I refer to as an implicit joint commit-ment.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [31 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_01081440
Contributor : Alban Bouvier <>
Submitted on : Friday, November 7, 2014 - 6:27:27 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, March 31, 2020 - 11:46:08 AM
Document(s) archivé(s) le : Sunday, February 8, 2015 - 11:11:17 AM

Files

Episteme HAL proof version.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Alban Bouvier. Passive Consensus and Active Commitment in the Sciences. Episteme, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2010, 7, pp.185 - 197. ⟨10.3366/E1742360010000936⟩. ⟨ijn_01081440⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

305

Files downloads

418