A. Almor, D. V. Smith, L. Bonilha, J. Fridriksson, and C. Rorden, What is in a name? Spatial brain circuits are used to track discourse references, NeuroReport, vol.18, issue.12, pp.18-1215, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32810f2e11

G. A. Alvarez and P. Cavanagh, The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects, Psychological Science, vol.1, issue.2, pp.106-111, 2004.
DOI : 10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419

G. A. Alvarez and P. Cavanagh, Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields, Psychological Science, vol.4, issue.3, pp.637-643, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90010-Y

G. A. Alvarez and S. L. Franconeri, How many objects can you track?: Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism, Journal of Vision, vol.7, issue.13, p.14, 2007.
DOI : 10.1167/7.13.14

URL : http://doi.org/10.1167/7.13.14

D. E. Anderson and E. Awh, RETRACTED ARTICLE: The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol.453, issue.12, pp.891-910, 2012.
DOI : 10.3758/s13414-012-0292-1

J. R. Anderson and L. M. Reder, The fan effect: New results and new theories., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.128, issue.2, p.186, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.128.2.186

J. L. Austin and . Warnock, Sense And Sensibilia; Reconstructed From The Manuscript Notes By, Bach, K. Thought and Reference, vol.40, 1964.

K. Bach, Getting a Thing into a Thought, New Essays on Singular Thought, p.39, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567881.003.0002

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

B. Bahrami, Object property encoding and change blindness in multiple object tracking, Visual Cognition, vol.40, issue.8, pp.949-963, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90010-Y

R. Baillargeon, Physical reasoning in infancy, The Cognitive Neurosciences, pp.181-204, 1995.

O. Ben-shahar, B. J. Scholl, and S. W. Zucker, Where objects come from: Attention, segmentation, and textons, Journal of Vision, vol.3, issue.9, pp.474-474, 2003.
DOI : 10.1167/3.9.474

URL : http://doi.org/10.1167/3.9.474

S. Blok, G. Newman, and L. J. Rips, Individuals and their concepts. Categorization inside and outside the lab, pp.127-149, 2005.
DOI : 10.1037/11156-008

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

P. Bloom, Different structures for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: One Mama, more milk, and many mice, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.21, issue.1, pp.66-67, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X98230408

P. Bloom, How children learn the meanings of words, 2002.

P. Bloom and S. A. Gelman, Psychological essentialism in selecting the 14th Dalai Lama, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.12, issue.7, pp.243-243, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.004

P. A. Boghossian, The transparency of mental content. Philosophical Perspectives, pp.33-50, 1994.

R. Boyd, Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa, Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, pp.141-85, 1999.

P. Boyer, If ???tracking??? is category-specific a ???common structure??? may be redundant, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.21, issue.1, pp.67-68, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X98240404

T. Burge, Origins of Objectivity, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581405.001.0001

L. Burke, On the tunnel effect, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.61, issue.3, pp.121-138, 1952.
DOI : 10.1016/0001-6918(50)90021-7

D. Burnston and J. Cohen, Perception of Features and Perception of Objects, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, vol.12, issue.3, pp.283-314, 2012.

T. Cacchione, M. Indino, K. Fujita, S. Itakura, T. Matsuno et al., Universal ontology Attentive tracking of objects and substances across languages and over development, International Journal of Behavioral Development, issue.6, pp.38-481, 2014.

J. Campbell, Is sense transparent? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, pp.273-292, 1987.

J. Campbell, Visual Attention and the Epistemic Role of Consciousness, 2011.

. Wu, Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays (p. 323)

S. Carey, The Origin of Concepts, 2009.

S. Carey and E. Spelke, Science and Core Knowledge, Philosophy of Science, vol.63, issue.4, pp.515-533, 1996.
DOI : 10.1086/289971

S. Carey and F. Xu, Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking, Cognition, vol.80, issue.1-2, pp.179-213, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00154-2

R. Casati, Is the object concept formal? Dialectica, pp.383-394, 2004.

Z. Chen, Object-based attention: A tutorial review, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol.115, issue.5, pp.784-802, 2012.
DOI : 10.3758/s13414-012-0322-z

Z. Chen and K. R. Cave, Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.70, issue.8, pp.1435-1443, 2008.
DOI : 10.3758/PP.70.8.1435

E. W. Cheries, S. R. Mitroff, K. Wynn, and B. J. Scholl, Cohesion as a constraint on object persistence in infancy, Developmental Science, vol.13, issue.6, pp.427-432, 2008.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1996.0005

M. Coppola and A. Senghas, The emergence of deixis in Nicaraguan signing. Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, pp.543-569, 2010.

N. Cowan, The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.24, issue.1, pp.87-114, 2001.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X01003922

T. Crane, The Singularity of Singular Thought Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, pp.21-43, 2011.

S. Crawford, Object-Dependent Thought The World in the Head, Encyclopaedia of the Mind, 2010.

I. Dickie, We are Acquainted with Ordinary Things*, New Essays on Singular Thought, pp.213-258, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567881.003.0008

H. Diessel, Demonstratives: form, function and grammaticalization, 1999.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.42

J. Driver, G. Davis, C. Russell, M. Turatto, and E. Freeman, Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects, Cognition, vol.80, issue.1-2, pp.61-95, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00151-7

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

S. Echeverri, (forthcoming) Object Files, Properties, and Perceptual Content, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, pp.1-25
DOI : 10.1007/s13164-015-0275-y

R. Egly, J. Driver, and R. D. Rafal, Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.123, issue.2, p.161, 1994.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.161

M. Ereshefsky and T. A. Reydon, Scientific kinds, Philosophical Studies, vol.35, issue.4, pp.969-986, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s11098-014-0301-4

L. Feigenson and S. Carey, On the limits of infants' quantification of small object arrays, Cognition, vol.97, issue.3, pp.295-313, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.010

J. I. Flombaum and B. J. Scholl, A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: Facilitated change detection for persisting objects., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.32, issue.4, p.840, 2006.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.840

J. I. Flombaum, B. J. Scholl, and L. R. Santos, Spatiotemporal priority as a fundamental principle of object persistence The Origins of Object Knowledge, pp.135-164, 2009.

J. A. Fodor, Lot 2: The Language of Thought Revisited, 2008.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548774.001.0001

S. L. Franconeri, G. A. Alvarez, and P. Cavanagh, Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.17, issue.3, pp.134-141, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.010

S. L. Franconeri, S. V. Jonathan, and J. M. Scimeca, Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing, Not by Speed, Time, or Capacity, Psychological Science, vol.4, issue.7, pp.920-925, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90010-Y

A. Gallois, Identity over time, 2008.

M. García-carpintero, A Presuppositional Account of Reference Fixing, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.97, issue.3, pp.109-147, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/2678500

D. Gentner, Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. Center for the Study of Reading Technical Report, 1982.

R. Goodman, (forthcoming) Against the Mental Files Conception of Singular Thought, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, pp.1-25

D. G. Hall, Proper Names in Early Word Learning: Rethinking a Theoretical Account of Lexical Development, Mind & Language, vol.30, issue.4, pp.404-432, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01368.x

C. Hansen and G. Rey, (forthcoming) Files and Singular Thoughts Without Objects or Acquaintance: The Prospects of Recanati's, Actualism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, pp.1-16

K. O. Hardman and N. Cowan, Remembering complex objects in visual working memory: Do capacity limits restrict objects or features?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.41, issue.2, 2014.
DOI : 10.1037/xlm0000031

J. Hawthorne and D. Manley, The Reference Book, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693672.001.0001

A. O. Holcombe and W. Chen, Splitting attention reduces temporal resolution from 7 Hz for tracking one object to <3 Hz when tracking three, Journal of Vision, vol.13, issue.1, p.12, 2013.
DOI : 10.1167/13.1.12

URL : http://doi.org/10.1167/13.1.12

A. O. Holcombe, W. Chen, and P. D. Howe, Object tracking: Absence of long-range spatial interference supports resource theories, Journal of Vision, vol.14, issue.6, 2014.
DOI : 10.1167/14.6.1

URL : http://doi.org/10.1167/14.6.1

A. Hollingworth and S. L. Franconeri, Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface feature cues, Cognition, vol.113, issue.2, pp.150-166, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.004

A. Hollingworth and I. P. Rasmussen, Binding objects to locations: The relationship between object files and visual working memory., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.36, issue.3, p.543, 2010.
DOI : 10.1037/a0017836

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163079

B. Hommel, Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes, Visual Cognition, vol.9, issue.1-2, pp.183-216, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5

B. Hommel, Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.8, issue.11, pp.494-500, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007

B. M. Hood and P. Bloom, Children prefer certain individuals over perfect duplicates, Cognition, vol.106, issue.1, pp.455-462, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.012

T. S. Horowitz and M. A. Cohen, Direction information in multiple object tracking is limited by a graded resource, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.72, issue.7, pp.1765-1775, 2010.
DOI : 10.3758/APP.72.7.1765

C. J. Howard and A. O. Holcombe, Tracking the changing features of multiple objects: Progressively poorer perceptual precision and progressively greater perceptual lag, Vision Research, vol.48, issue.9, pp.1164-1180, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.visres.2008.01.023

M. Huff, F. Papenmeier, and J. M. Zacks, Visual target detection is impaired at event boundaries, Visual Cognition, vol.20, issue.7, pp.848-864, 2012.
DOI : 10.1080/13506280802000752

G. Huntley-fenner, S. Carey, and A. Solimando, Objects are individuals but stuff doesn't count: perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants' representations of small groups of discrete entities, Cognition, vol.85, issue.3, pp.85-203, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00088-4

J. R. Hurford, The neural basis of predicate-argument structure, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.26, issue.03, pp.261-283, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X03000074

R. Jeshion, The significance of names. Mind and Language, pp.370-403, 2009.

R. Jeshion, Singular Thought: Acquaintance, Semantic Instrumentalism, and Cognitivism*, New Essays on Singular Thought, pp.105-141, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567881.003.0005

R. Jeshion, Two Dogmas of Russellianism, Empty Representations, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647057.003.0003

K. E. Jordan, K. Clark, and S. R. Mitroff, See an object, hear an object file: Object correspondence transcends sensory modality, Visual Cognition, vol.14, issue.4, pp.492-503, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91276-0

D. Kahneman and A. Treisman, Changing views of attention and automaticity. Varieties of attention, pp.29-61, 1984.

D. Kahneman, A. Treisman, and B. J. Gibbs, The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information, Cognitive Psychology, vol.24, issue.2, pp.175-219, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O

H. Kamp, Context, Thought and Communication, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol.85, pp.239-261, 1984.
DOI : 10.1163/9789004252882_015

J. Kim, Perception and Reference without Causality, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.74, issue.10, pp.606-620, 1977.
DOI : 10.2307/2025913

P. Krøjgaard, Object individuation in 10-month-old infants, Cognitive Development, vol.15, issue.2, pp.169-184, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00020-4

K. Lawlor, New Thoughts About Old Things: Cognitive Policies as the Ground of Singular Concepts, 2001.

D. Lewis, Putnam's paradox, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol.62, issue.3, pp.221-236, 1984.
DOI : 10.1080/00048408412340013

B. M. Liverence and B. J. Scholl, Selective Attention Warps Spatial Representation: Parallel but Opposing Effects on Attended Versus Inhibited Objects, Psychological Science, vol.22, issue.12, pp.1600-1608, 2011.
DOI : 10.1177/0956797611422543

S. J. Luck and E. K. Vogel, The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions, Nature, issue.6657, pp.390-279, 1997.

S. J. Luck and E. K. Vogel, Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.17, issue.8, pp.391-400, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006

Y. Luo and R. Baillargeon, When the ordinary seems unexpected: evidence for incremental physical knowledge in young infants, Cognition, vol.95, issue.3, pp.95-297, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.010

J. P. Magliano and J. M. Zacks, The Impact of Continuity Editing in Narrative Film on Event Segmentation, Cognitive Science, vol.123, issue.2, pp.1489-1517, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01202.x

G. F. Marcus, The Algebraic Mind, 2001.

E. Margolis, How to acquire a concept. Mind and Language, pp.347-369, 1998.

R. P. Meier and D. Lillo-martin, The points of language, 2013.

R. G. Millikan, A common structure for concepts of individuals, stuffs, and real kinds: More Mama, more milk, and more mouse, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.21, issue.01, pp.55-65, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X98000405

R. G. Millikan, On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay About Substance Concepts, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511613296

S. R. Mitroff and G. A. Alvarez, Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.90, issue.6, pp.1199-1204, 2007.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03193113

S. R. Mitroff, B. J. Scholl, and K. Wynn, Divide and Conquer, Psychological Science, vol.14, issue.6, pp.420-425, 2004.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00695.x

S. R. Mitroff, B. J. Scholl, and K. Wynn, The relationship between object files and conscious perception, Cognition, vol.96, issue.1, pp.67-92, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.008

M. Montague, The Phenomenology of Particularity, Cognitive Phenomenology, pp.121-140, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579938.003.0006

C. M. Moore, T. Stephens, and E. Hein, Features, as well as space and time, guide object persistence, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.30, issue.5, pp.731-736, 2010.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1996.0005

M. Murez and J. Smortchkova, Singular Thought: ObjectFiles, PersonFiles, and the Sortal PERSON, Topics in cognitive science, vol.6, issue.4, pp.632-646, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0163

D. Newtson and G. Engquist, The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.12, issue.5, pp.436-450, 1976.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(76)90076-7

N. S. Noles, B. J. Scholl, and S. R. Mitroff, The persistence of object file representations, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.127, issue.2, pp.324-334, 2005.
DOI : 10.3758/BF03206495

L. J. Norman, C. A. Heywood, and R. W. Kentridge, Object-Based Attention Without Awareness, Psychological Science, vol.15, issue.6, pp.836-843, 2013.
DOI : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4748-07.2008

D. Odic, O. Roth, and J. I. Flombaum, The relationship between apparent motion and object files, Visual Cognition, vol.60, issue.9, pp.1052-1081, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.01.001

L. Oksama and J. Hyönä, Is multiple object tracking carried out automatically by an early vision mechanism independent of higher???order cognition? An individual difference approach, Visual Cognition, vol.11, issue.5, pp.631-671, 2004.
DOI : 10.1080/13506280344000473

L. Oksama and J. Hyönä, Dynamic binding of identity and location information: A serial model of multiple identity tracking, Cognitive Psychology, vol.56, issue.4, pp.237-283, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.03.001

N. Orlandi, The Innocent Eye: Why Vision is Not a Cognitive Process, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199375035.001.0001

C. Peacocke, Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content?, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.98, issue.5, pp.239-264, 2001.
DOI : 10.2307/2678383

J. Perry, A Problem About Continued Belief, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol.61, issue.4, p.317, 1980.

J. Perry, The Problem of the Essential Indexical: And Other Essays, 1993.

Y. Pinto, P. D. Howe, M. A. Cohen, and T. S. Horowitz, The more often you see an object, the easier it becomes to track it, Journal of Vision, vol.10, issue.10, p.10, 2010.
DOI : 10.1167/10.10.4

J. J. Prinz, The return of concept empiricism Categorization and Cognitive Science, 2005.

S. Prosser, Cognitive dynamics and indexicals. Mind and Language, pp.369-391, 2005.

Z. Pylyshyn, Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities, Visual Cognition, vol.11, issue.7, pp.801-822, 2004.
DOI : 10.1080/13506280344000518

Z. W. Pylyshyn, Things and Places: How the Mind Connects with the World, 2007.

G. A. Radvansky, The fan effect: A tale of two theories., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.128, issue.2, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.128.2.198

G. A. Radvansky and J. M. Zacks, Event perception, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, vol.95, issue.6, pp.608-620, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/wcs.133

F. Recanati, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, 1993.

F. Recanati, Deixis and Anaphora, Semantics Versus Pragmatics, pp.286-316, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0007

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00000293

F. Recanati, Singular Thought: In Defense of Acquaintance, New Essays on Singular Thought, 2010.

F. Recanati, Mental Files, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659982.001.0001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00784032

F. Recanati, Mental Files: Replies to my Critics, Disputatio, vol.5, issue.36, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659982.001.0001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00926193

R. A. Rensink and J. T. Enns, Early completion of occluded objects, Vision Research, vol.38, issue.15-16, pp.2489-2505, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00051-0

R. Rugani, L. Fontanari, E. Simoni, L. Regolin, and G. Vallortigara, Arithmetic in newborn chicks, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol.358, issue.6389, pp.276-2451, 1666.
DOI : 10.1038/358749a0

M. Sainsbury, Reference Without Referents, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/0199241805.001.0001

S. Sawyer, Cognitivism: A New Theory of Singular Thought? Mind and Language, pp.264-283, 2012.

R. Saxe, J. B. Tenenbaum, and S. Carey, Secret Agents: Inferences About Hidden Causes by 10- and 12-Month-Old Infants, Psychological Science, vol.9, issue.12, pp.16-995, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00058-4

S. Schiffer, The basis of reference, Erkenntnis, vol.13, issue.1, pp.171-206, 1978.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00160893

S. Schiffer, The Mode-of-Presentation Problem, Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind, pp.249-268, 1990.

S. Schiffer, Book review, Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.19, issue.1, pp.91-102, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00593040

P. Schlenker, Donkey anaphora: the view from sign language (ASL and LSF), Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.2, issue.3, pp.341-395, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s10988-011-9098-1

B. Scholl, Objects and attention: the state of the art, Cognition, vol.80, issue.1-2, pp.1-46, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00152-9

B. J. Scholl, Object persistence in philosophy and psychology. Mind and Language, pp.563-591, 2007.

B. J. Scholl, What have we learned about attention from multiple object tracking (and vice versa). Computation, cognition, and Pylyshyn, pp.49-78, 2009.

B. J. Scholl and A. M. Leslie, Explaining the infant's object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. What is cognitive science, pp.26-73, 1999.

B. J. Scholl and Y. Xu, The magical number 4 in vision, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.24, issue.1, pp.145-146, 2001.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X01523924

L. Schroeter, Illusion of Transparency, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol.61, issue.4, pp.597-618, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-8349.00036

J. M. Scimeca and S. L. Franconeri, Selecting and tracking multiple objects, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, vol.12, issue.2, pp.109-118, 2015.
DOI : 10.1002/wcs.1328

J. R. Searle, Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, 1983.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139173452

T. F. Shipley, T. F. Shipley, and J. M. Zachs, An invitation to an event. Understanding Events: From Perception to Action: From Perception to Action, pp.3-30, 2008.

E. S. Spelke, Principles of Object Perception, Cognitive Science, vol.13, issue.1, pp.29-56, 1990.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_3

E. S. Spelke and K. D. Kinzler, Core knowledge, Developmental Science, vol.8, issue.2, pp.89-96, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00206261

B. Strickland and F. Keil, Event completion: Event based inferences distort memory in a matter of seconds, Cognition, vol.121, issue.3, pp.409-415, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.007

K. M. Swallow, J. M. Zacks, and R. A. Abrams, Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.138, issue.2, p.236, 2009.
DOI : 10.1037/a0015631

K. A. Taylor, Reference and the Rational Mind, 2003.

M. Tomasello, Origins of Human Communication, 2008.

S. P. Tripathy, H. Ogmen, and S. Narasimhan, Multiple-object tracking: A serial attentional process, 2011.

V. Tsompanidis, Mental Files and Times, Topoi, vol.4, issue.18, pp.233-240, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s11245-014-9247-6

K. Van-marle and B. J. Scholl, Attentive tracking of objects ys. substances, Psychological Science, vol.14, 2003.

T. J. Vickery and M. M. Chun, Object-based warping an illusory distortion of space within objects, 2010.

E. K. Vogel, G. F. Woodman, and S. J. Luck, Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory Visual working memory for observed actions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.27, issue.1364, p.639, 2001.

F. Xu, Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.11, issue.9, pp.400-406, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.002

F. Xu and S. Carey, Infants??? Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity, Cognitive Psychology, vol.30, issue.2, pp.111-153, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1996.0005

Y. Xu and M. M. Chun, Selecting and perceiving multiple visual objects, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.13, issue.4, pp.167-174, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.008

J. M. Zacks and K. M. Swallow, Event Segmentation, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol.130, issue.2, pp.80-84, 2007.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3